Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX vs Apple M4 (9 cores) vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 235HX

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is a fast mid-range mobile CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 20 cores consisting of 6 of the 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.1 GHz and 8 of the 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed. The CPU can access 24 MB L2 cache and 26 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with three of the four Xe cores running at 300 - 1800 MHz.

Performance - High End

Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should be just before or at the level of the Raptor Lake Core i9-14500HX (6 + 8 cores, max 5 / 3.5 GHz). This makes the CPU very suitable for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming (2024 games) and content creation. The performance difference to the Core Ultra 5 245HX is only slight, as the CPUs only differ in the base clock of the performance cores (2.9 vs 3.1 GHz).

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

Apple M4 (9 cores)

► remove from comparison Apple M4 (9 cores)

The 9-core Apple M4 is a rather fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) that sports 9 CPU cores, a 16-core neural engine and a 10-core GPU with hardware RT support and other modern features. Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 as well as Thunderbolt 3 and USB 4 are all onboard, too. The M4 debuted in May 2024 as part of an iPad launch event; it has 3 performance cores running at a clock speed of up to 4.3 GHz and 6 efficient cores running at way under 3 GHz whereas the M3 (10 GPU cores) has 4 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores.

The faster 10-core M4 chip delivers 10% higher multi-thread performance and 15% higher graphics performance, to give you a rough figure. More importantly, the 10-core M4 can be had in systems with an active cooling solution, such as Fall 2024 MacBook Pros, whereas the 9-core one is an iPad Pro exclusive. Systems with a fan deliver much higher sustained performance than the ones without it.

Architecture and Features

The new CPU cores run at faster clock speeds than what the M3 was capable of and they also feature minor architectural improvements. The CPU cores are thought to be based on the ARM v9.4-A microarchitecture to a certain degree. The M4 comes with 16 GB or more (depending on the SKU) of on-package LPDDR5x-7500 RAM whereas the M3 was limited to 6400 MT/s. The updated NPU delivers up to 38 TOPS of performance for AI workloads.

Performance

Single-thread performance, multi-thread performance and NPU performance all got a noticeable boost compared to what we had with the M3 (10 GPU cores). The new processor is about 11% faster than the M3 in short-term multi-thread workloads while besting every M3 series chip possible in single-thread tasks by a comfortable margin. Geekbench 6.2 Multi puts the 9-core M4 right above the Core i9-13900H and the Ryzen 7 7840HS; in fact, the M4 is just 3% slower than Intel's top-of-the-line Core Ultra 9 185H chip. A 13% to 18% single-thread performance improvement over M3 series chips is evident if we look at Mozilla's Kraken test results. Octane V2 seems to think the M4 is just 4% slower than Intel's mighty Core i9-14900HX. CrossMark results suggest the M4 is about as fast as the Core i9-13900H.

The 10-core M4 is about 10% faster in multi-threaded tasks than the 9-core part is. It also delivers just slightly higher single-thread performance.

While Apple undoubtedly deserves some praise for what it managed to do here, it is important to highlight that all of the tests we did involve short-term workloads only. The M4 will suffer from heavy throttling if subjected to long-term workloads as there is no active cooling inside that super-thin iPad Pro case.

Graphics

The M4 GPU (10 cores) has hardware support for ray tracing as well as mesh shading and other modern technologies. It supports external displays with resolutions as high as "8K".

As far as performance is concerned, it appears the 9-core M4's GPU runs at significantly lower clock speeds than the (otherwise the same) GPU built into the 10-core M4 chip. This leads to a disappointing situation where what's supposedly a newer graphics adapter is about 10% slower than the 10-core GPU built into the M3. Still, this M4 GPU delivers very decent benchmark scores that put it in the same ballpark as the Radeon RX 6500M.

Power consumption

The chip's sustained power consumption is limited to ~7 W, with short-term peaks of up to 14 W possible.

The chip is built with a "second generation" 3 nm TSMC process that's still cutting-edge as of late 2024.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 255HX

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 20 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.2 GHz and 12 of the 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 30 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 1850 MHz.

Performance - High End

Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform just behind or at the level of the Raptor Lake Core i9-14700HX (8 + 12 cores, max 5.5 / 3.9 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 235HXApple M4 (9 cores)Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
CodenameArrow Lake-HXArrow Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeApple M4Intel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX « 2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)2.59 - 4.51 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)2.59 - 4.51 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M4 (10 cores)2.89 - 4.46 GHz10 / 10 cores
Apple M4 (9 cores) « 2.9 - 4.4 GHz9 / 9 cores
Apple M4 (8 cores)2.9 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX « 2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock2600 - 5100 MHz2900 - 4400 MHz2300 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB4 MB30 MB
L3 Cache26 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 14
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
9 / 9
3 x 4.4 GHz Apple M4 P-Core
6 x 2.9 GHz Apple M4 E-Core
20 / 20
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
12 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP55 Watt9 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt14 Watt160 Watt
Technology3 nm3 nm3 nm
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 3-core GPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz)Apple M4 10-core GPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 1850 MHz)
Architecturex86ARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.com
FeaturesUnified Memory LPDDR5X-7500 (120 GB/s), 16-Core Neural Engine, Media Engine (Encoding / Decoding: H.264, HEVC, ProRes, ProRes RAW, AV1 Decoding only)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 255HX
46 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 124     avg: 126.5     median: 126.5 (71%)     max: 129 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1500     avg: 1593     median: 1592.5 (30%)     max: 1685 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 27129     avg: 29464     median: 29463.5 (27%)     max: 31798 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2111     avg: 2139     median: 2139 (90%)     max: 2167 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 822     avg: 829     median: 828.5 (90%)     max: 835 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 10626     avg: 11471     median: 11471 (28%)     max: 12316 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4114     avg: 4455     median: 4455 (28%)     max: 4796 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 322     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (90%)     max: 327 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
50.3 Points (65%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
4 Points (94%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11779 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
81019 Points (59%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10319 Points (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 87806     avg: 93241     median: 93240.5 (54%)     max: 98675 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6407     avg: 6423     median: 6423 (76%)     max: 6439 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
215.6 fps (72%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
385.3 fps (89%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.4     avg: 32     median: 32 (56%)     max: 33.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.8 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.6 GB/s (62%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.8 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 171     avg: 184.5     median: 184.5 (2%)     max: 198 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 106     avg: 114     median: 114 (1%)     max: 122 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.421     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4275 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17993 Points (38%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
375 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 22207     avg: 24379     median: 24379 (60%)     max: 26551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21049     avg: 23659     median: 23659 (60%)     max: 26269 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 36734     avg: 40401     median: 40400.5 (72%)     max: 44067 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14763     avg: 15196     median: 15195.5 (64%)     max: 15628 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3662 Points (91%)
min: 2917     avg: 2942     median: 2923 (73%)     max: 2985 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
13350 Points (52%)
min: 16396     avg: 17305     median: 16885 (66%)     max: 18635 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2182     avg: 2184     median: 2183.5 (85%)     max: 2185 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18263     avg: 19639     median: 19638.5 (35%)     max: 21014 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
9053 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
69317 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
325.6 ms (0%)
425 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
105035 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 305     avg: 305.5     median: 305.5 (84%)     max: 306 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
414 Points (74%)
min: 319     avg: 322     median: 322 (58%)     max: 325 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
2547450 Points (84%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
696637 Points (20%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1880 Points (70%)
min: 1944     avg: 2021     median: 2020.5 (76%)     max: 2097 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 156.1     avg: 175.9     median: 175.9 (30%)     max: 195.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
9.8 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.2     avg: 28.8     median: 28.8 (19%)     max: 32.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)
min: 16.5     avg: 18.6     median: 18.6 (21%)     max: 20.7 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 (9 cores) → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 14. 23:39:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18896 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17540 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18892 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752529143s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18896 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 18896 +0s ... 0.01s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17540 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 17540 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18892 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#13 got single benchmarks 18892 +0.006s ... 0.025s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.056s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)