Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700

UNISOC Tangula T760

► remove from comparison Tangula T760

The Unisoc T760 Tanggula (former Spreadtrum) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with two clusters. Four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz and four small ARM-Cortex-A55 cores at again up to 2 GHz for efficiency. The faster T770 SoC offers higher clocked A76 cores in comparison (up to 2.5 GHz for a single core).

One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 780 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T770 offers hardware AI acceleration.

The chip is manufactured in the modern 6nm process.

MediaTek Dimensity 700

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 700

The Mediatek Dimensity 700 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.2 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Compared to the similar Dimensity 800U, the 700 offers lower clocked CPU cores (-200 MHz) and a slower GPU (one less core).

Furthermore, the chip integrates a 2 core ARM Mali-G57 MC2 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x-2133 memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

The Dimensity 700 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

show full text
ModelUNISOC Tangula T760MediaTek Dimensity 700
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7002 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 7002 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock2000 - 2000 MHz2000 - 2200 MHz
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm7 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 4-in-1, 64M ZSL)2x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC2, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 650 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ( - 950 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 700

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 700
34 pt (58%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -69%
...
Mediatek Helio G80 -14%
Mediatek Helio P90 -14%
MediaTek Dimensity 720 -11%
Mediatek Helio G70 -10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 -7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 -6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 -4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G -3%
MediaTek Dimensity 700
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G 3%
HiSilicon Kirin 810 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 4%
Mediatek Helio G95 4%
MediaTek Dimensity 800 6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 6%
Mediatek Helio G90T 8%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 73%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2948     avg: 3232     median: 3279.5 (41%)     max: 3355 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2824     avg: 3215     median: 3233.5 (47%)     max: 3393 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
541 Points (26%)
min: 454     avg: 544     median: 562.5 (28%)     max: 574 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2155 Points (7%)
min: 1347     avg: 1667     median: 1708.5 (6%)     max: 1775 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2411 Points (37%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7951 Points (19%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2543     avg: 3101     median: 3236.5 (4%)     max: 3387 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
592 ms (6%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15459     avg: 16421     median: 16423 (17%)     max: 17380 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 50     avg: 54     median: 54 (14%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 47297     avg: 52091     median: 54449 (46%)     max: 54527 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 58096     avg: 62582     median: 64237 (52%)     max: 65412 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 53159     avg: 54199     median: 53559 (10%)     max: 55880 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 85682     avg: 88181     median: 87969 (32%)     max: 90891 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 249843     avg: 257053     median: 260248 (25%)     max: 261067 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
3167 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 17430     avg: 18702     median: 18702 (51%)     max: 19974 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 6492     avg: 8201     median: 8199.5 (44%)     max: 10433 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8245 Points (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
19850 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6368     avg: 8541     median: 8407.5 (55%)     max: 10981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
14990 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.91     avg: 4     median: 2.9 (13%)     max: 6.04 Watt
012345678Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 0.9     median: 1.3 (5%)     max: 1.387 Watt
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.811.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92Tooltip

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 700 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 06. 21:21:54

#0 checking url part for id 14027 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13199 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.059s ... 0.066s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.069s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.069s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.069s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 14027 +0s ... 0.07s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#19 got single benchmarks 14027 +0.006s ... 0.076s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.08s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.085s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 13199 +0.002s ... 0.088s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#25 got single benchmarks 13199 +0.033s ... 0.122s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.123s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.124s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.124s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#52 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.124s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.131s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.133s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.135s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.033s ... 0.167s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.167s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.167s

#102 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.179s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.18s

#104 return log +0.004s ... 0.184s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)