The Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 is an entry level laptop processor based on the Penryn core. It offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6600, the T6670 offers Virtualization VT-x and a higher maximum temperature of 105°C.
The Core 2 Duo SL9300 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.6 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.
Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 25. 21:58:55
#0 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 423 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0s ... 0.011s
#8 got single benchmarks 467 +0.009s ... 0.02s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 423 +0s ... 0.021s
#10 got single benchmarks 423 +0s ... 0.021s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.021s
#12 got single benchmarks 397 +0.016s ... 0.037s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.042s