Samsung P500-Pro T7250

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Samsung P500-Pro T7250

70% Samsung P500
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Samsung P500 is a good quality laptop, but while on paper it is very much in keeping with other budget laptops, when it came to daily use, it failed to shine. That said, the screen and keyboard are usable and the build quality is more than acceptable for the price.
3.5 von 5, Verarbeitung gut, Display gut, Preis gut, Leistung schlecht, Austattung schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/12/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 40% features: 40% display: 80% workmanship: 80%

60% Samsung P500 notebook review
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
The Samsung P500 is a well-built machine that offers decent if not outstanding value for money. The build quality is mixed, with a solid design but the keyboard does tend to let the overall effect down. However, it's not the most powerful and the rather basic specification means that you won't be able to do as many things as you'd possibly like. We'd suggest raising your budget and opting for a faster machine.
6 von 10, Preis sehr gut, Mobilität gut, Leistung mangelhaft
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/08/2008
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 90% performance: 50% mobility: 80%

Foreign Reviews

Bezahlbares Business-Notebook
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 3-4/08
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/22/2008
Rating: price: 80% display: 80% ergonomy: 80%

76% Sparbücher
Source: Connect
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/10/2008
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% display: 80%

70% Unauffällig und antibakteriell
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 90% features: 20% display: 30% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 90%

Comment

ATI Radeon Xpress 1250: Chipset graphics based on the dedicated X300.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.

T7250: Mid-range (at the time of annoucement) dual core processor based on the Merom core. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight