Samsung P200 Pro
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung P200 Pro
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe Samsung P200 proved a highly practical and likeable machine. With its mix of impressive performance and quality screen and keyboard, this is a great choice for anyone looking for a powerhouse portable to take on the road.
4 von 5, Preis gut, Mobilität gut, Display gut, Verarbeitung gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/17/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: CNet
Archive.org versionWe like the P200. It's compact, well built and has plenty of power under the bonnet. Sure, it's lacking in the ports department, but for many users that isn't such a big drawback. Overall, we reckon it's a good option for those who are after a powerful thin-and-light that doesn't cost a fortune.
7.5 von 10, Leistung gut, Verarbeitung gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/14/2008
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint
Archive.org versionThe Samsung P200 is an impressive notebook. It's well-built and the keyboard comfortable to use. For the price, the battery life and specification are more than impressive. So, if you're on a tight budget and in the need of a small and compact notebook, this is a great choice.
8 von 10, Ausstattung sehr gut, Display mäßig, Mobilität gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/28/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% display: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint
Archive.org versionThe Samsung P200 is an attractive and highly likeable machine. While aimed at the business user, anyone looking for a lightweight machine merely for everyday tasks, this has to be worth considering. The keyboard feels great and while the screen is only a standard TFT, it’s bright and images look sharp.
8 von 10, Preis fantastisch, Leistung sehr gut, Display mangelhaft
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 95% performance: 90% display: 50%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 3-4/09
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80%
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2008
Rating: performance: 80% mobility: 40%
Source: Chip.de - 6/08
Comparison, , Long, Date: 06/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 80% performance: 100% features: 73% display: 79% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 78%
Source: Connect
Comparison, , Long, Date: 06/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 94% features: 80% mobility: 64% ergonomy: 70%
Source: c't - 13/08
Single Review, , Long, Date: 06/01/2008
Rating: performance: 70% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 90% features: 30% display: 30% mobility: 30% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Comment
ATI Radeon Xpress X1250: It is an onboard graphic chip, implemented on AMD M690G. Sometimes, it is also called Mobility Radeon X1250. It is based on X700 design but with less pixel- and vertex pipelines. It hardly suited for players.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
T8100: Former mid-range Core 2 Duo based on the Penryn core that features FSB800 and VT-x virtualization functions.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
