Samsung Galaxy A9 2016
Specifications
Samsung Galaxy A9 2016 (Galaxy Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 8c/8t 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Graphics adapter
unknown
Display
6.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
200 g ( = 7.05 oz / 0.44 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 3 scores (from 4 reviews)
Average of 3 scores (from 4 reviews)
price: 80%, performance: 87%, features: - %, display: 87% mobility: 92%, workmanship: 87%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A9 2016
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) Review
Source: Phone Arena
Archive.org version
The Galaxy A9 is an enormous, yet elegant smartphone. Looking across the board, it has no glaring weaknesses – its performance actually reflecting its price point rather well. You're not getting the best of the best here, but rather a very nice smartphone that won't disappoint in any area – it's just very good, not great. I think it's a fair deal, considering you won't be paying top dollar.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Phone Arena
Archive.org versionThe Galaxy A9 is an enormous, yet elegant smartphone. Looking across the board, it has no glaring weaknesses – its performance actually reflecting its price point rather well. You're not getting the best of the best here, but rather a very nice smartphone that won't disappoint in any area – it's just very good, not great. I think it's a fair deal, considering you won't be paying top dollar.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) review
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
Samsung has put a lot of work into the new Galaxy A series and it's clear it wants to recreate the flagship success of the S and Note phones, except in a more attractive price bracket. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) will be the face of the series - its size is an instant attention-grabber and its specs are better than the other A models. Sometimes the A9 has slightly better specs, other times the gap is significant. The clearest example is the chipset, it's essentially twice as fast as the S615 used in the A5 and A7 that we tested earlier. Here are our other impressions of the A9, summarized.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2016
Source: GSM Arena
Archive.org versionSamsung has put a lot of work into the new Galaxy A series and it's clear it wants to recreate the flagship success of the S and Note phones, except in a more attractive price bracket. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) will be the face of the series - its size is an instant attention-grabber and its specs are better than the other A models. Sometimes the A9 has slightly better specs, other times the gap is significant. The clearest example is the chipset, it's essentially twice as fast as the S615 used in the A5 and A7 that we tested earlier. Here are our other impressions of the A9, summarized.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2016
A premium mid-range smartphone that is a worthy flagship competitor
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A9 can be found on Amazon priced at close to the $600 mark, which is quite steep, but given the flagship features this device provides, it does make sense. Available color options include silver, white, gold, and pink gold.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 87% display: 88% mobility: 96% workmanship: 93%
Source: Android Authority
Archive.org versionThe Samsung Galaxy A9 can be found on Amazon priced at close to the $600 mark, which is quite steep, but given the flagship features this device provides, it does make sense. Available color options include silver, white, gold, and pink gold.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 87% display: 88% mobility: 96% workmanship: 93%
Foreign Reviews
Samsung Galaxy A9 2016 recensione
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 80%
Comment
unknown:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
652 MSM8976: Upper middle class ARM based SoC with 8 CPU cores (64 Bit Cortex A72 and A53 mixture) and a Adreno 510 GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Add as a preferred
