Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro 555X

The AMD Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile graphics card based on the small Polaris 21 chip from AMD. It is available in the 15-inch Apple MacBook Pro (Mid 2018 model with Coffee Lake) and is the performance is similar to the old Radeon Pro 455 / 555. The difference is the slightly higher clock rate of 907 MHz versus 855 MHz (+6%) and the bigger graphics memory (4 GB versus 2 GB GDDR5). The Polaris 21 chip is produced in a 14nm FinFET process and is the smaller Polaris chip.

Both the performance and the power consumption are roughly on par with the Nvidia GeForce MX150 (laptop version of the GT 1030), which is also equipped with 2 GB GDDR5-VRAM.

More information about the Polaris architecture is available in our dedicated article. More benchmarks including gaming tests are listed on the dedicated page for the similarly powerful Radeon Pro 555Radeon Pro 455.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card that was first seen in the Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Entry, 2019) in mid 2019. It is similar to the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in the 28 Watt CPUs.

The so called GT3e version of the Coffee-Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1150 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 645 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-2133/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 645 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-8557U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 655 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M or GeForce 940MX and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used for 15-Watt processor and therefore small-sized notebooks.

AMD Radeon Pro 555XIntel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Gen. 9.5 Series
Radeon Pro 560 compare 1024 @ 0.91 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon Pro 555X 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon Pro 555 compare 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenamePolaris 21Kaby Lake GT3e
ArchitecturePolarisGen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Pipelines768 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed855 MHz300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5080 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3, DDR4
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL VulkanDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption<35 Watt
Transistors3 Billion
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncQuickSync
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement05.06.2017 10.07.2019
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 645GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8557U4 x 1700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8257U4 x 1400 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
1736 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1893 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
624 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
550 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3238 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2985 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55.3     avg: 67.1     median: 67.1 (4%)     max: 78.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.2 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
69.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
101.8 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
198.3 fps (2%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
37.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.5  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
76.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
57.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.9  fps
low 1280x720
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
104.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
60  fps
high 1366x768
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
51.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.1  fps
AMD Radeon Pro 555XIntel Iris Plus Graphics 645
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1137.426.122.5
Dota 2 Reborn76.557.32926.9
BioShock Infinite104.66051.622.1
AMD Radeon Pro 555XIntel Iris Plus Graphics 645
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
1
1
1
2
1

2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 05. 01:02:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8892 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9902 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762300978s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 04 Nov 2025 05:21:25 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8892 +0.014s ... 0.033s

#9 got single benchmarks 8892 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0s ... 0.036s

#11 got single benchmarks 9902 +0.004s ... 0.04s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.046s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.046s

#15 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.048s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.048s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.048s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.049s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.049s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)