Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Intel Xeon W-11955M

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 2700U, the PRO versions offer additional security features. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is suited for all applications.

Intel Xeon W-11955M

► remove from comparison Intel W-11955M

The Intel Xeon W-11955M is a high end octa core SoC for laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and was announced in mid 2021. It integrates eight Willow Cove processor cores (16 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is at 2.6 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 5 GHz (ITBM 3.0, also two cores), all cores can reach up to 4.5 GHz. The CPU offers 24 MB level 3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory. Similar to the Core i9-11950H, the Xeon W-11955M supports SIPP, vPro and TXT. In addition to this, the Xeon line supports ECC memory.

Performance

The average W-11955M in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 4800H, Core i7-11850H, Core i7-1360P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly fast chip, as of early 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card called UHD graphics with all 32 EUs.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

Power consumption

This Xeon series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 35 W to 45 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value to get better performance.

The W-11955M is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700UIntel Xeon W-11955M
CodenameZenTiger Lake-H
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)Intel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U « 2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900KB compare3.3 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900H compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11950H compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11955M « 2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11850H compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11800H compare2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11855M compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11500B compare3.3 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400H compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11260H compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2200 - 3800 MHz2600 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB640 KB
L2 Cache2 MB10 MB
L3 Cache4 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketAM4BGA1787
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10862     avg: 11637     median: 11637 (11%)     max: 12412 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1480     avg: 1551     median: 1550.5 (65%)     max: 1621 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
568 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4250 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1846 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
230 Points (64%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8815 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
47264 MIPS (27%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5222 MIPS (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
13.4 fps (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.6 GB/s (22%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
276 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
360 s (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
22819 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9385 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
882 Points (34%)
min: 1487     avg: 1587     median: 1586.5 (62%)     max: 1686 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3183 Points (6%)
min: 8349     avg: 9058     median: 9057.5 (16%)     max: 9766 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1484 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8230 Points (26%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6286 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33776 Points (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
642 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
60397 Points (44%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
271 Points (49%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.3 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
98.2 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
27.3 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.8 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-11955M → 232% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 20. 20:33:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10132 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13209 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755714785s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10132 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 10132 +0s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13209 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 13209 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.026s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)