Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 7320U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

AMD Ryzen 3 7320U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 7320U

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320U is a mobile processor for cheap laptops of the Mendocino series. It integrates four older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series like the Ryzen 3 4300U). The CPU cores clock from 2.4 GHz (base) to 4.1 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 4 MB L3 cache. Thanks to SMT/Hyperthreading, the CPU can work on 8 threads simultaneously. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.). Compared to the fastest Mendocino model the Ryzen 5 7520U, the 7320U offers lower clocked CPU cores (400 MHz base, and 200 MHz Turbo).

The integrated graphics adapter (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the 7320U, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be about as fast as the Ryzen 3 3100 (four Zen 2 cores running up to 3.9 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Mendocino series chips are produced on a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The R3 7320U is rated at 8-15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 7320UAMD Ryzen 3 3300U
CodenameMendocino-U (Zen 2)Zen+
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U compare2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 8
4 x 4.1 GHz AMD Zen 2
4 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology6 nm12 nm
FeaturesLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Transistors4500 Million
SocketAM4

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300U
23.4 pt (39%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
337 Points (37%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
921 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
471 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
134 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4280 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
12357 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
404.6 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2398 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
12118 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3340 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
132.1 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.8 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.7 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1212 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4332 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.8 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
709 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4587 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51741 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
47170 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
55407 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3953 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5629 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2006 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1343 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
4190 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
824 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2578 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
843 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2722 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3861 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10787 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3672 Points (41%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10223 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
10170 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3469 Points (45%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
11467 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3780 Points (57%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8470 Points (45%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6808 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12111 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8746 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9508 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1192     avg: 1237     median: 1236.5 (1%)     max: 1281 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
136.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27764 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 141     avg: 153.5     median: 153.5 (28%)     max: 166 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 7320U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 07. 05:36:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14611 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11181 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759808214s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14611 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 14611 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11181 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 11181 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.041s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)