Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro P4200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4200

The Nvidia Quadro P4200 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is based on the GP104 chip (like the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 or 1080 for laptops) and features 2304 shader cores. The clock rate is not disclosed but the theoretical SP performance is rated at 8.9 TFLOPs (for the fast Max-P version) and therefore faster than the old Quadro P5000 but below the Quadro P5200 (see table below). The P4200 is equipped with 8 GB GDDR5 which leads to 224 GB7s peak bandwidth due to the 256 Bit memory bus. There are two variants available, a Max-P performance version and a Max-Q version tuned for efficiency (with lower clock speeds).

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P4200 is rated at 115 Watt TGP (max power consumption incl. memory) and therefore 15 Watt more than the Quadro P5000. The card is therefore best suited for large 17-inch notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Max-Q

The Nvidia Quadro P3000 Max-Q (official Nvidia Quadro P3000 with Max-Q Design) is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), it is based on the GP106 chip with 1280 shaders. The graphics card is the more efficient version of the normal Quadro P3000 with slightly reduced clock speeds at a much reduced power consumption (60 Watt versus 75 Watt TGP).

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The theoretical performance should be only slightly below the normal Quadro P3000 (as it was with the Max-Q GTX 1060 versus the normal GTX 1060).

NVIDIA Quadro P4200NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Max-Q
Quadro P Series
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
ArchitecturePascalPascal
Pipelines2304 - unified1280 - unified
Core Speed1215 - 1480 (Boost) MHz1075 - 1240 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7132 MHz7008 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB16 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption115 Watt60 Watt
technology16 nm16 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement07.05.2018 01.09.2017
CodenameN17E-Q1 Max-Q

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 11280     avg: 12485     median: 12485 (31%)     max: 13690 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P4200 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 18:54:29

#0 checking url part for id 8814 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8080 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.049s ... 0.049s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.054s ... 0.104s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.104s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.104s

#19 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.104s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 8814 +0.029s ... 0.133s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.134s

#22 got single benchmarks 8814 +0.005s ... 0.139s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 8080 +0s ... 0.14s

#24 got single benchmarks 8080 +0s ... 0.14s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.14s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.14s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.14s

#30 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.142s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.143s

#32 return log +0.003s ... 0.145s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)