NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 300M business graphic card based on the GeForce Go 7600 for laptops and is optimized (by drivers and Bios) for business tasks. Stability and reliability are focussed. The performance ought to be similar (slightly below) the GeForce Go 7600.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M

► remove

The NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100 is a business graphics card for laptops which is most likely based on the same core as the GeForce GT 330m / Quadro FX 880M. The NVS series is optimized for business applications and stability and may therefore perform a bit worse in games due to the special drivers and BIOS optimizations.

As the GT 330M, the NVS5100 should support PureVideo HD (VP4?) to accelerate HD videos and CUDA / DirectX Compute to use the render cores for other applications.

 

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

► remove

The NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M is a business entry-level graphics card for laptop. It is based on the GeForce 8500M GT consumer graphics card and designed for the business sector providing enhanced compatibility and stability. Regarding performance it should be comparable to a 8400M GT, but, might rate a little lower, because of the drivers that emphasize on stability.  Therefore, the NVS 140M provides only entry-level 3D performance.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300MNVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100MNVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro NVS Series
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 530 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 530 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 530 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
CodenameG72GLMN10P-NSG84M
8 / 5 48 - 16 -
Core450 MHz550 MHz400 MHz
Memory500 MHz800 MHz700 MHz
Bus128 Bit128 Bit64 Bit
MemoryGDDR3DDR3GDDR3, GDDR2
nonoyes
DirectXDirectX 9b, 3.0DirectX 10.1, 4.1DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors177 Million210 Million
Technology90 nm40 nm80 nm
Size
Introduced24.05.2006 07.01.2010 09.05.2007
PCI-E
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_nvs_...http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_860...
ArchitectureGT2xx
Shader1210 MHz800 MHz
Max. Memory1024 MB256 MB
FeaturesVGA, DVI-D, LVDS, HDTV, HDMI screen connections, max 2 per card, nView, PCI-e 16x

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
24702 Points (26%)
min: 7396     avg: 12268.3     median: 13071 (14%)     max: 13747 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
18881 Points (10%)
min: 3185     avg: 4557     median: 5242 (3%)     max: 5244 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
13125 Points (25%)
min: 1969     avg: 2942.7     median: 3127 (6%)     max: 3177 Points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
+ NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
7.4 fps (16%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
5.7 fps (12%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
20.8 fps (11%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
8.6 fps (17%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
15.2 fps (23%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
3.2 fps (8%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
4 fps (8%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
6.5 points (93%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
6.5 points (93%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M → 49%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
Quadro NVS 140M:
121.5  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro NVS 140M:
43.9  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro NVS 140M:
21.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro NVS 140M:
5.6  fps
Quadro NVS 140M:
»
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Quadro NVS 5100M:
59  fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro NVS 5100M:
19  fps
Quadro NVS 5100M:
»
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
Quadro NVS 5100M:
225  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro NVS 5100M:
58  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro NVS 5100M:
21  fps
Quadro NVS 5100M:
»
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
high 1280x1024
Quadro NVS 5100M:
29  fps
Quadro NVS 5100M:
»
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Quadro NVS 140M:
59 278 309 ~ 215 fps
med. 800x600
Quadro NVS 140M:
55 57 ~ 56 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro NVS 140M:
16 17 ~ 17 fps
Quadro NVS 140M:
»
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro NVS 140M:
86.8 99.9 102 ~ 96 fps
med. 640x480
Quadro NVS 140M:
95.7 100.3 102 ~ 99 fps
high 800x600
Quadro NVS 140M:
64.7 65.6 65.7 ~ 65 fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro NVS 140M:
25.4 31.4 39.1 39.5 ~ 34 fps
Quadro NVS 140M:
»
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Quadro NVS 140M:
127.5  fps
Quadro NVS 140M:
»
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)