Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M is a upper mid-range professional graphics card for mobile workstations with about 15" displays. It is based on the same chip as the GeForce GT 335M but can be also equipped with fast GDDR5 graphics memory. The FX1800M is shipped with professional drivers and a special BIOS that improves the performance and stability in applications like CAD and DCC.

The certified drivers guarantee flawless and fast working with professional applications like Premiere, Photoshop, After Effect, AutoCAD, 3ds Max, trueSpace, Blender, Catia, IronCAD, Cinema 4D, Lightwave 3D, Softimage, Mathematica ... A list of all certified applications can be found on the Nvidia.com homepage. Compared to GeForce products, the Quadro FX cards offer a significantly better performance, especially for OpenGL based apps.

The gaming performance should be similar to the GeForce GT 335M, altough gamers should choose a GeForce graphics card because of the optimized driver support (that leads to a better performance and less problems in games). Still all modern and demanding games of 2009 should at least run in medium detail settings (see the GeForce GT 335M page for more gaming results).

The chip is manufactured in 40nm and offers 72 1-dimensional unified shaders. These can be compared to about 300-400 5-dimensional shaders in graphics cards by AMD. These processing cores can also be accessed with CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute to use the calculation power for other tasks than rendering images (for example transcoding videos). 

The QuadroFX 1800M also supports PureVideo HD with the new VideoProcessor (VP4) to decode HD videos on the graphics card. This helps reducing CPU load and increasing battery runtimes.

The Quadro FX 1800M also supports the automatic switching between the integrated and dedicated graphics card using Optimus. First mobile workstations do not offer Optimus, as the development cycles of these laptops are very long.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 380M is a professional entry-level graphics card for mobile workstations. It is based on the GeForce 310M and therefore the 3D performance is not very good. Due to special drivers and optimizations, the performance for professional applications should be much better (than the 310M would perform). Another advantage are the certified drivers than ensure a good performance of professional applications without errors.

The card supports DirectX 10.1 and all the features of the G 310M (as it is based on the same GT218 core). Therefore PureVideo HD to decode HD videos with the graphics card is supported. The used Video Processor 4 (VP4) is able to fully decode H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and also MPEG-4 ASP (DivX or xVID) in hardware to minimize CPU load. MPEG-1 is not supported but can be easily handled by every modern CPU.

The gaming performance of the FX380M is similar to the GeForce 310M and therefore located in the entry level class. The professional drivers are however optimized for applications and may therefore deliver a worse performance. Modern 3D games like COD Modern Warfare 2 run only in low details and resolutions fluently. Some demanding games like NFS Shift or GTA4 wont run fluently at all. Less demanding games like SIMS 3 run in medium details and resolutions fluently. Therefore, the graphics card can not be recommended for gamers.

As the FX380M supports CUDA, DirectX Compute 10.1, and OpenCL, the shaders of the graphics processor can be used for other tasks than rendering images (e.g. faster encoding of videos).

The used GT218 core is manufactured in 40nm and based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1800MNVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMn10m-glm
ArchitectureG7xGT2xxGT2xx
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader72 - unified16 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz560 MHz625 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz1100 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3DDR3, GDDR5GDDR3, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption20 Watt45 Watt25 Watt
Transistors278 Million260 Million
technology90 nm40 nm40 nm
Features90nmPowerMizer 9.0, EnergyStar (3.8W), 16x FSAA Support, CUDA, NVIEW, OpenGL 3.2DirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, OpenGL 2.1, certified drivers
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 01.02.2010 07.01.2010
InformationPCI-E, 90nm
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader Speed1125 MHz1530 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3444     avg: 3452     median: 3451.5 (3%)     max: 3459 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2774     avg: 2801     median: 2800.5 (2%)     max: 2827 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
15249 Points (21%)
7095 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
3690 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 7416     avg: 7573     median: 7572.5 (11%)     max: 7729 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
3687 Points (6%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
12.4 fps (9%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
13 fps (22%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
28.1 fps (34%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.5 fps (31%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
39 fps (42%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
12.3 fps (6%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
17.5 fps (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
5 Points (63%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
20 fps (7%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M → 212% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M → 101% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 27. 06:55:08

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1649 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1620 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.068s ... 0.068s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.071s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.071s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.071s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.071s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.041s ... 0.112s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#43 got single benchmarks 7 +0.006s ... 0.119s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 1649 +0s ... 0.119s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#46 got single benchmarks 1649 +0.005s ... 0.125s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 1620 +0s ... 0.125s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#49 got single benchmarks 1620 +0.004s ... 0.129s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.131s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.137s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.138s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#78 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.138s

#79 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.138s

#80 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.14s

#81 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.14s

#82 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.141s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.142s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.142s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.142s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.143s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.144s

#91 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.144s

#92 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.144s

#93 return log +0.001s ... 0.145s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)