Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD A12-9700P vs AMD FX-9800P

AMD Pro A10-8700B

► remove from comparison AMD Pro A10-8700B

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

It is similar to the consumer version, the A10-8700P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

AMD FX-9800P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9800P

The AMD FX-9800P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9800P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 15-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The ULV chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9800P is slightly ahead of the old 15-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with a Intel Core i3-6100U (Skylake, 15 Watts). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9800P with 12-15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the APU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelAMD Pro A10-8700BAMD A12-9700PAMD FX-9800P
CodenameCarrizoBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B « 1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1800 - 3200 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
SocketFP4 BGAFP4
FeaturesHSA 1.0Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
192 Points (1%)
min: 222     avg: 225.5     median: 225.5 (1%)     max: 229 Points
236 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
70 Points (19%)
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (22%)     max: 80 Points
74 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.3 Points (3%)
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
2.9 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (19%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.94 Points
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2200 Points (13%)
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (15%)     max: 2596 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5907 Points (4%)
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (4%)     max: 7188 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
949 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
30.7 s (6%)
14.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
897 Points (1%)
1462 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.1 fps (3%)
16.7 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
45.4 fps (10%)
84.6 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2798 Points (6%)
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (7%)     max: 3652 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43.1 s (9%)
19.2 s (4%)
33 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
94.7 s (4%)
42.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1994 s (9%)
980 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
7608 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2096     avg: 2124     median: 2123.5 (5%)     max: 2151 Points
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (6%)     max: 2530 Points
2393 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
21226 Points (17%)
25886 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
25743 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
27373 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1870 Points (5%)
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1375     avg: 1976     median: 1975.5 (4%)     max: 2576 Points
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (6%)     max: 3268 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
675 Points (3%)
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2158 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4899 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2728 Points (5%)
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
950 Points (19%)
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (41%)     max: 2120 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2906 Points (5%)
5824 Points (9%)
5496 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1030 Points (15%)
2308 Points (35%)
2057 Points (31%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2262     avg: 3038     median: 3038 (4%)     max: 3814 ms
2059 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 181.6     avg: 193.4     median: 193.4 (2%)     max: 205.1 ms
164.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9042     avg: 12632     median: 12632 (10%)     max: 16222 Points
19404 Points (15%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.3 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A10-8700B → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 150% n=8

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9800P → 137% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 07. 23:19:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7008 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8158 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751923180s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:21:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7008 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 7008 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#11 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8158 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#13 got single benchmarks 8158 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.052s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)