Oppo A54s

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Oppo A54s

Oppo A16s / A54s Screen Replacement
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2023

75% OPPO A54s Review: Budget Phone With Large Battery And Triple Camera
Source: Root Nation
OPPO A54s is a decent budget device. The phone has a good screen quality, good ergonomics and not too large, by today’s standards, dimensions, a convenient fingerprint scanner in the side button, a 5000 mAh battery (it lives really long due to the low screen resolution + weak processor), NFC. The main camera makes quite decent photos in good light. In turn, what can we say about the cons? First of all, this is a budget solution and because of the price there are a lot of simplifications, namely: HD screen instead of FullHD, refresh rate of only 60 Hz, basic processor, minimal RAM, plastic case that collects a billion fingerprints in 5 seconds, poor night mode, lack of a wide-angle module. And all this would be quite acceptable if the model was cheaper. $170 is really too much. More powerful models with better displays and cameras can be purchased, for example, for $150-220, POCO M3 Pro 5G, POCO M5, Redmi Note 11, Redmi Note 10S 6/64GB, Motorola Moto G31, VIVO Y33s 8/128GB, realme 9i, realme 8 5G. As you can see, the list of “competitors” is really long.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 90%

60% Oppo A54s review
Source: Techradar
With so many Oppo phones now out there, you can't help but wonder who the Oppo A54s is really meant to appeal to. It's fine. Just fine. Cheap at around $190/£179/AU$299, it might seem appealing at first, but for not much more you could have the Oppo A54 5G with 5G support and better performance. That leaves you wondering just why the Oppo A54s is worth anyone's time. It is at least helped by its camera. With a triple-lens rear snapper, its main sensor is 50MP and fairly competent. Quicker to use than most other parts of the phone, it's ideal for those on a tight budget desperate to have okay photography at their disposal. Even if it does overexpose a tad. The Oppo A54s is a bit slow and it lacks 5G, but a reasonable camera and decent battery life help it seem better value. Still, this isn't a phone that stands out.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%

Oppo A54s Review, Pros and Cons
Source: OI Spice Tech News
The Oppo A54s is a decent choice for a mid-range smartphone if you’re looking for standard features and 4G connectivity. There are a few things worth noting about the phone – like the huge battery size and decent processing power. Apart from that, the camera setup looks a bit average, but it does its essential job. If you are considering an alternative to this phone, we recommend the Vivo iQOO Z5x as it has many features that the Oppo A54s phone does not have. But the ultimate decision is in your hands, so make the final decision after calculating all your needs.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/05/2021

Foreign Reviews

66% Recenzja Oppo A54s – byłoby dobrze, gdyby było taniej
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%

Comment

Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Helio G35: ARM based octa core SoC (8x small ARM Cortex-A53 cores) clocked at up to 2.3 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.4 LTE modem and a PowerVR G38320 at 680 MHz. The SoC is produced in 12nm (FinFET) and except for the higher clock speed similar to the old Helio G25.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

6.52":

It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.

67%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU