Nokia 7.1
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24mm
Pricecompare
Average of 46 scores (from 85 reviews)
Reviews for the Nokia 7.1
HMD's Nokia 7.1 is based on Android One, and thus free of unnecessary apps, most commonly referred to as bloatware. The result is supposed to be a minimalistic and fast system, designed to run even more demanding apps. Find out in our review whether or not this turned out to be true, and how the Nokia 7.1 did when compared to its rivals.
Source: PC Mag Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 offers a winning combination of great performance, killer looks, and up-to-date Android software for a reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin Archive.org version
Despite some frustrating issues with the software, I've found the Nokia 7.1 to be a very enjoyable phone overall. I can breeze through almost everything I do on it, the screen is absolutely beautiful, and the camera usually produces very pleasant results, with vibrant colors that make pictures feel really alive. I also love the simple, but attractive design of the phone, with the silver accented edges really adding the right amount of flair to an otherwise plain look.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2019
Source: The Techy Archive.org version
The Galaxy A9 looks very similar to the Galaxy A7, but the A9 got an additional camera. While the Galaxy A7 sports triple camera, the Galaxy A9 took a step further by offering new innovations in the form of a quad-camera setup on the rear side. That said, the phone follows Samsung’s glass and metal design language. There’s no flex whatsoever, but the delicate glass body can be cracked easily if it falls on the hard surface. I recommend a case just to protect the delicate back glass panel. The fingerprint sensor is right above the Samsung logo and it was easy to unlock my smartphone with one hand. Apart from the fingerprint scanner, the Galaxy A9 has included facial recognition which works like charm.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2019
Source: Ausdroid Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is tough to recommend because of its performance issues that left a dark cloud over my enjoyment of it, but it’s still worthy of some consideration.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2019
Source: Talk Android Archive.org version
At $350, this is the phone to beat going into 2019. The design feels significantly above what you pay for it, and it delivers performance that can get pretty close to matching phones double its price. You’ve got a ton of storage (64GB, with a microSD card slot), it has a headphone jack, and the camera’s not bad. The phones that do these things better are going to cost quite a bit more, and in some cases, you’re losing either the headphone jack or microSD card, if not both.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2019
Source: Reliance Digital Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is an elegantly designed smartphone at a budget price tag of Rs. 19,990*. It offers some premium features such as a HDR display, great camera and solid build quality, which can be great for everyday use. With the Android One support and its frequent security updates, this phone is a good future-proof option. However, the lack of top-end hardware can sometimes be noticed. If your daily activity demands use of graphic intensive applications and games like PUBG and Fortnite, you should consider the Nokia 8.1 which packs a more powerful piece of hardware such as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 and Adreno 616 GPU.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech2 Archive.org version
Overall though, the Poco F1 is definitely a better package. While Nokia 7.1 and Poco F1 are at par at most of the features and specifications, the Poco also has a better battery performance. The lower variant of the Poco F1, which is priced at Rs 20,999 (just Rs 1,000 more) also comes with 6 GB of RAM, as compared to 4 GB RAM on the Nokia 7.1. Though you must consider that Nokia 7.1 vs Poco F1 means, Android One vs MIUI OS. So, unless Xiaomi's custom UI is a problem, I'd say go for the Poco F1, no bargain here. But if you are looking for something stylish, the Nokia 7.1 is a better choice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Sydney Morning Herald Archive.org version
But the software is the biggest selling point here. There are a few Android tricks that Google keeps for itself, like its fancy moving wallpapers and unlimited full-res photo storage, but for all intents and purposes using the Nokia 7.1 is like using a Pixel phone. It's clean, reliable and intuitive, and for some it will be tough to argue that the extra bit of power and sophistication you get with a Pixel 3 is worth another $700.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Fone Arena Archive.org version
While Nokia 7.1 remains the cheapest HDR display smartphones right now, it is far from being a Value For Money (VFM) device. If you want a reliable Nokia device under Rs. 20,000, Nokia 7.1 is a good option. In case if you are specific about Android One, you can check out Moto One Power or Mi A2 at slightly cheaper rates. If you care about performance and gaming, POCO F1 is a very good option at the same price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: The Indian Express Archive.org version
Nokia 7.1 is one of the most good-looking phones in this price segment in my opinion and the display stands out as well. Plus, you get Android Pie experience on this budget device. But its biggest competitor I feel is Nokia’s own 6.1 Plus which has a similar design and same processor at a lower price. Another option is the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, which is made of aluminium 600 series, has a splash-resistant coating, and Snapdragon 636 as well.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Htxt Africa Archive.org version
Is the Nokia 7.1 worth upgrading to if you already own a mid-range Nokia phone? The short answer is no, especially if you have something like the Nokia 7 Plus, which sports many of the same specifications sans screen notch. If, however, it's been awhile since you bought a new phone and you're in the market for a mid-range device, your money would be well spent on the R6k Nokia 7.1.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: India Today Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is just a more polished Nokia 6.1 Plus and at the end of the day you will have to ask yourself whether you're willing to spend a little extra for a few premium features. The few new technologies such as the PureDisplay screen offers a noticeable improvement in the display. The Zeiss camera also offers better low-light performance than before. If these are features that matter to you a lot then the Nokia 7.1 makes sense, otherwise one should rather stick with the Nokia 6.1 Plus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Think Digit Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 scores big on display and camera but falls short of its competitor when it comes to performance. The design of the phone makes it a classy looking thing, but the lack of a TPU case in the box is concerning due to the all-glass construction. Its not an all-rounder, but it is great for people looking for a smartphone with a good camera in this budget.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets Archive.org version
Power users might be better served by Poco F1 (Review) and Honor Play (Review), which are powered by flagship grade processors. However, the all-plastic Poco F1 does not look or feel as premium as the Nokia 7.1 and both MIUI and EMUI are cluttered and laden with third-party bloat. For the average joe, the Nokia 7.1 would make for a solid everyday smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
On paper, the Nokia 7.1 looks like one of the best phones at the price, but it's let down by poor battery life and general performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetguy Archive.org version
As you can probably guess, I am very taken with this second-generation Nokia 7.1. Nokia has pulled another rabbit out of the hat. There are no deal breakers; it offers features common to devices at twice the price (including the Nokia 8.1 Sirocco).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 98% price: 100% performance: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: Good Gear Guide Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 isn’t a device without caveats but I think it’s one that’ll pay off for those looking to get a decent smartphone at a decent price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tom's Guide Archive.org version
Nokia has quietly released one of the most exciting inexpensive phones of the year in the Nokia 7.1, a well-designed phone that delivers first-rate performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central Archive.org version
Nokia knocked it out of the park with the Nokia 7.1. It looks and feels great, has a gorgeous display, excellent battery life, and much more. Performance can be a little sluggish at times, but for just $350, you're getting far more than your money's worth.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
With the Nokia 7.1, the brand continues its run of impressive mid-range phones carrying close-to-stock Android. While the phone has weaknesses, overall it offers better quality and features than you would expect at this price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Bill Bennett Archive.org version
The Nokia 7.1 is only available from Spark in New Zealand. It’s an ideal choice for someone looking to get more phone for less money. If you buy phones for employees or for younger family members this will stretch your money further, with few compromises.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2018
Source: Tech Switch Archive.org version
You aren’t getting something fancy like an in-screen fingerprint scanner – the fingerprint scanner is across the again, as regular. With a thickness of 8mm it is also barely chunkier than a few of the finest telephones round, although you are probably not going to note the distinction.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/03/2018
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
Like the Motorola One before it, the Nokia 7.1 is a good phone that simply can't compete with the best from Honor and Xiaomi. The biggest letdown here being the performance, which is a mar on an otherwise well-designed and pleasing device.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/27/2018
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
So, if you are keen on having one of the best Android One phones on the market, go and test the Nokia 7.1 for yourself. You may find it surprisingly fitting if blazing-fast performance isn't a must.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
Despite the crowded mid-range the Nokia 7.1 is one of the better choices for a smartphone in the price range in what is a very crowded market.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
Nokia’s rendered an attractive handset with some capable hardware and a nice unique selling point for just a touch more than the likes of the Motorola One and Honor Play.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2018
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
Nokia Mobile is now in the top five of Android smartphone manufacturers and it's no wonder: the phones are great. Looking at this handset, it's really rather hard to justify spending double on a flagship handset even if some of the specs - notably the camera - are significantly better.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2018
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
Its generic but solid design is improved with an above average display and the ongoing attractiveness of opting for Android One mean it’s a phone we will fully review with interest and could be the sweet spot for Nokia’s busy line up.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
First we saw the wave of ultra-expensive phones with notches. Now we get the backlash: notchy phones many more of us can afford. That has to be good news, right?
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
It was only ever a matter of time until Nokia started getting noticed again. Once the initial wave of nostalgic joy subsided, the sticky business of putting out phones began, and so far Nokia has hardly skipped a beat. Nearly every phone it’s put out over that last two years has been great. This is no easy feat, not even in the mid-range Nokia occupies so comfortably. Despite the difficulties, the results are showing: Nokia is now in the top ten smartphone manufacturers globally and the top five in 25 markets. Not bad for a less-than-two-year-old effort.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The highlight of the Nokia 7.1 is the updated display technology, and with minor but useful improvements to the design and camera this may be one of the best affordable phones of the year.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: CNet Archive.org version
Unless you're into rectangular phones with shiny accents, the Nokia 7.1 probably isn't going to win you over with its looks -- a neutral tone with shiny accents around the buttons and rim. But it might win you over with a combination of its price, which starts at a reasonable $349, and its specs. A midrange device in the US and abroad, the 2018 version of the Nokia 7 aims to excel in the middle ground. It tees up good overall specs and performance for the cost.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
We liked the Nokia 7.1 and are looking forward to testing out the 3,060mAh battery, the new dual camera and give that HDR 10-compliant display a go at our scientific tests.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 82% features: 67% display: 86% mobility: 71%
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 64% performance: 58% display: 80% mobility: 54% workmanship: 100%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: A1 Blog DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: n-tv DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/13/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Blick DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 95%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 93%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; good price; solid workmanship; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/11/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive display; great cameras; good price. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 78%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 65% features: 75% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; nice display; good cameras; metal case; stylish design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; solid workmanship; nice performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Techstation.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; solid workmanship; good display; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; elegant design; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; decent wireless speakers.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; attractive design; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 85% mobility: 40% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; nice performance; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: High price; weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; good price; nice cameras; decent display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; decent hardware; nice display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; excellent display; nice cameras; fast charging; support NFC. Negative: Average performance; combined slot; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; support HDR mode; great dual cameras; high performance; NFC module; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; elegant design; great built quality; nice cameras; decent battery life; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Unlimited Tech →EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Arena IT →EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 90% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful price; nice display; elegant design; good cameras. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2018
Comment
Model: The Nokia 7.1 is an inexpensive handset but equipped with decent hardware and build. However, the most highlighted selling point of the Nokia 7.1 is the camera. It is all about capturing photos that look so good. The dual rear cameras with ZEISS optics deliver stunning shots, while the AI technology lets the user add an artistic touch to every photo with 3D personas, masks and filters. Users can capture crisper and sharper images with increased luminosity, a wider range of colors and more detail in both bright and dark areas with the striking and true-to-life HDR feature. The ZEISS optics also allow users to capture professional-looking photos with effortless bokeh blur. The PureDisplay is another highlight of the Nokia 7.1. Whether users are outdoors in bright sunlight or in a dimly lit room, Nokia 7.1’s display will dynamically adapt to the environment for a spectacular viewing experience inside or out. The Full HD+ 5.84’’ PureDisplay screen with a 19:9 ratio goes edge-to-edge for a bigger experience without the bigger handset. Glass front and back, shaped at the edges for comfort, and with a 6000 series aluminium frame; Nokia 7.1 stands out with its diamond-cut colored chamfers.
With Qualcomm’s reliable Snapdragon 636 processor driving the Nokia 7.1, paired with 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of storage, it should handle minimal multitasking without major problems. If a user does not have enough storage, there is a microSD slot for adding storage. As for the battery, the Nokia 7.1 features a non-removable Li-Ion 3,060 mAh battery. The all-day battery life in Nokia 7.1 lets users watch, play and surf longer without charging. And users will have enough performance for everything from AR gaming to streaming, thanks to the powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 mobile platform. Nokia 7.1 also run on Android One, which features a pure Google experience with services like the Google Assistant and Google Photos. The Nokia 7.1 features an interesting optional accessory, which is the Nokia True Wireless Earbuds. A user can enjoy wireless entertainment without compromising on sound quality by pairing their Nokia 7.1 with Nokia True Wireless Earbuds. The ultra-lightweight earbuds fit in an easily pocketable charging case, which includes a battery that can recharge the earbuds for up to 14 hours of audio entertainment. As a conclusion, the Nokia 7.1 is a smartphone featuring great and solid hardware which should satisfy most user’s requirements. It is a value for money smartphone which can compete in the mid-range market well.
Hands-on article by Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Qualcomm Adreno 509: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 636 SoC based on the Adreno 500 architecture. Most likely featuring a slightly higher core clock compared to the Adreno 508.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 636: Mid-range octa-core SoC with eight Kryo 260 cpu cores at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 509 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller and a X12 LTE (Cat 13/12, 300 / 150 MBit) modem. Manufactured in the modern 14nm process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.84":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Nokia: Nokia is a Finnish company founded in 1865 and headquartered in Finland. The company is known for its telecommunications equipment and cell phones. Nokia was one of the leading manufacturers of cell phones in the 1990s and has expanded its business into networking and technology solutions in recent years.
In 2011, Nokia partnered with Microsoft on Windows-based cell phones and sold the entire cell phone division to Microsoft in 2014, which limited the Nokia brand name to basic cell phones. In 2016, Finnish electronics manufacturer HMD Global entered into a licensing agreement with Nokia, bought the remaining Nokia name rights from Microsoft Mobile, and since 2017 has exclusively offered Nokia cell phones worldwide, which are based on Android, among other things, and are produced by Foxconn.
75.92%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.