Nokia 6.2
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12 µm
Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 27 reviews)
Reviews for the Nokia 6.2
The Nokia 6.2 is a cheap mid-range smartphone from the Android One program with no major weaknesses relative to the affordable starting price. However, there is one Android competitor that makes life hard for the Nokia phone and only really leaves it as an interesting alternative for Android purists.
Source: Ricks Tech
Archive.org versionSupport, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/06/2021
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionIt may lack the style and Zeiss Optics-enabled cameras of the more expensive Nokia 7.2, but if you’re looking for a good-looking budget smartphone with a high-quality display and can overlook the lacklustre camera setup, the Nokia 6.2 is worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone Arena
Archive.org versionThe Nokia 6.2 is a cute budget smartphone that offers a very good display and capable rear camera. Where it falters a bit is the selfie camera and the general system performance, as the Snapdragon 636 barely keeps up with a moderate usage pace. Still, at a price of $250 at the time of writing, the Nokia 6.2 is a respectable smartphone for those who value a massive screen and stylish design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena
Archive.org versionWell, with everything that's going on with the Nokia 6.2, or not, we just can't recommend this Android One-powered smartphone no matter what. Maybe, just maybe, if its price drops down to €150 or lower, or your carrier is giving it for free, then you should consider it. But we strongly believe that even then we can find you a better phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 56%
Source: Android Authority
Archive.org versionIf you have only a couple hundred dollars to spend on a smartphone, HMD Global’s latest Nokia mid-rangers should be at the top of your list. The Nokia 7.2 and Nokia 6.2 may share the same design and materials, but each has its own internals that set up widely different price points.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2019
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionIt may lack the style and Zeiss Optics-enabled cameras of the more expensive Nokia 7.2, but if you’re looking for a decent mid-range smartphone with a great design and high-quality display, the Nokia 6.2 is certainly worth considering. We’ll provide a full verdict and star rating once we get a sample back to Tech Advisor towers, so check back soon for our final thoughts on the Nokia 6.2.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2019
Source: NDTV Gadgets
Archive.org versionHMD Global on Thursday made its first appearance at IFA, one of Europe's most important technology trade exhibitions, to talk about how it is growing internationally and expanding on its strengths. The company unveiled two new smartphones and three featurephones, showcasing its strategy of appealing to multiple markets. The new Nokia 7.2 and Nokia 6.2 are both mid-budget Android smartphones but both promise premium features and looks. They should be launched internationally, including in India, within a few months. Gadgets 360 was live at the scene of the launch in Berlin, and here are our first impressions of both new devices.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/06/2019
Source: Pocket Lint
Archive.org versionThe Nokia 6.2 sits in a competitive place. Starting at around €199, you get a great display and compelling array of cameras with just enough power to keep things ticking along nicely. Of course we've only spent limited time with this phone so far, but we have high hopes for it. The biggest question, however, is whether the Nokia 7.2 is going to cast a long shadow over this cheaper handset.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionIt may lack the style and Zeiss Optics-enabled cameras of the more expensive Nokia 7.2, but if you’re looking for a decent mid-range smartphone with a great design and high-quality display, the Nokia 6.2 is certainly worth considering. We’ll provide a full verdict and star rating once we get a sample back to Tech Advisor towers, so check back soon for our final thoughts on the Nokia 6.2.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionWith its three cameras on the back, nice-looking display and Android One software, the Nokia 6.2 looks like it could be a rival to the Moto G series and the likes of Redmi, Realme and Honor. Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe Nokia 6.2 looks to be a strong contender at the affordable end of the Android smartphone market. Whether it can really challenge Honor, Huawei and Motorola remains to be seen, but the early signs are positive.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Android Authority
Archive.org versionThese phones hit the market in mere weeks. The Nokia 7.2 should arrive before the end of September for 349 euros. It will be sold in most markets worldwide, include the U.S. (via open channels). HMD says it is working to strengthen its relationships with U.S. carriers and until it does the open market is the way it will go. The Nokia 6.2 will go on sale in mid-October at the more affordable price point of 209 euros. The 6.2 will not be sold in the U.S. and is something HMD expects to sell across Asia, Africa, and EMEA. The pricing and availability details are not final and may change.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Android Central
Archive.org versionThe Nokia 6.2 is a solid, if uninspired, budget phone that gets the job done. With a modern design, snappy performance, and excellent rear camera, it's worth the money. But the occasional performance hiccup and poor front-facing camera hamper the excitement somewhat. Still, you can't do much better for $250.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2002
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: WinFuture
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2020
Source: Andro 4 All
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; good price; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2020
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price; elegant design; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price; nice design; great built quality; decent hardware; good performance.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 09/05/2019
Source: Antyweb
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; great built quality; good display; support both dual SIM and memory card slot. Negative: Weak processor; mediocre speakers; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2020
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Stylish design; excellent display; NFC; nice triple cameras; low price. Negative: Weak processor; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2020
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; beautiful design; decent hardware; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2019
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Attractive price; beautiful design; decent hardware; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/22/2019
Source: Viettelstore
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; nice display; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2019
Source: The Gioididong
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; decent hardware; nice cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/09/2019
Source: Danviet
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; decent hardware; nice display; metal case; attractive price.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/06/2019
Source: Mobil.se
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 70%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 509: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 636 SoC based on the Adreno 500 architecture. Most likely featuring a slightly higher core clock compared to the Adreno 508.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 636: Mid-range octa-core SoC with eight Kryo 260 cpu cores at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 509 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller and a X12 LTE (Cat 13/12, 300 / 150 MBit) modem. Manufactured in the modern 14nm process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

