, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron N2830 vs Intel Celeron N2930

Intel Celeron N2830

► remove from comparison Intel N2830

The Intel Celeron N2830 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2830 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2830 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2830 even competes with older dual core CPUs like the Core 2 Duo SU9400. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 750 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2930

► remove from comparison Intel N2930

The Intel Celeron N2930 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2930 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2930 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2930 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2930
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
2160 - 2410 MHz1830 - 2160 MHz
112 KB224 KB
1 MB2 MB
2 / 24 / 4
7.5 7.5
22 22
105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2930

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 66     avg: 68.3     median: 67 (1%)     max: 71 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.6     median: 38 (14%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.87 Points
min: 1.39     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (14%)     max: 0.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1088     avg: 1178     median: 1184.5 (11%)     max: 1241
min: 1120     avg: 1131     median: 1131.5 (10%)     max: 1141
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2145     avg: 2253     median: 2239.5 (4%)     max: 2356
min: 3687     avg: 3865     median: 3880 (6%)     max: 4013
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3340 Points (3%)
min: 5663     avg: 5709     median: 5708.5 (5%)     max: 5754 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1783 Points (13%)
min: 1525     avg: 1567     median: 1566.5 (11%)     max: 1608 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2930 +
852 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2930 +
27.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2930 +
1181 (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2930 +
9.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2930 +
47 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2930 +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2930 +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2930 +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2930 +
2214 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2930 +
38.7 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2930 +
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2930 +
1814 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 970     avg: 1018     median: 1027 (4%)     max: 1052 Points
min: 1594     avg: 1666     median: 1679 (6%)     max: 1693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 10142     avg: 10740     median: 10610 (7%)     max: 11180 Points
min: 4049     avg: 14857     median: 17776 (11%)     max: 18182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 812     avg: 846     median: 850 (2%)     max: 877 Points
min: 331     avg: 1258     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1532 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2930 +
2493 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2930 +
2275 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2930 +
2992 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2930 +
3477 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
2968 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1557     avg: 1569     median: 1565 (3%)     max: 1589
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 891     avg: 908     median: 909 (19%)     max: 928
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4141.2     avg: 4944     median: 4482 (8%)     max: 6995.9 ms
min: 4663.9     avg: 9867     median: 7469.7 (13%)     max: 19862.8 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 319     avg: 433     median: 375 (4%)     max: 592 ms
min: 378.6     avg: 828     median: 423.3 (5%)     max: 2303.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4542     avg: 6715     median: 7211 (10%)     max: 7397 Points
min: 1238     avg: 4231     median: 4176.5 (6%)     max: 7334 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
41680 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 N2930 +
2046 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2830 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2930 → 133% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 02:40:15

#0 checking url part for id 5684 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5686 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5684 +0s ... 0.012s

#7 got single benchmarks 5684 +0.015s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5686 +0s ... 0.027s

#9 got single benchmarks 5686 +0.01s ... 0.037s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.056s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)