Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is a slower clocked Mobility HD 4860 and based on the 40nm RV740 core. Therefore, it is similar to the desktop HD 4700 series. Because of the 40nm production process, the power consumption should be similar to the HD 4670 (according to rumors).

Instead of GDDR5 memory of the HD 4860, the 4830 can be only equipped with slow DDR3 or faster GDDR3. Therefore, the 128 Bit memory bus becomes a bottle neck and the performance is clearly degraded.

The gaming performance of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD4830 is sufficient for demanding games of 2009 in medium - high details. Our gaming benchmarks (see below) showed that a high preset in Crysis or NFS Shift resulted in barely playable framerates around 25 fps. Less demanding games, are playable in high resolution and detail settings.

The Mobility HD 4830 is based on the RV740 chip and features 640 stream processors (128 5-dimensional shader cores). These cores do the graphic work of the shader- and pixel pipelines of older GPUs. The stream processors are also called ALUs and are grouped in five-way VLIW units. Each of the five instructions of a VLIW bundle has to be independent from the others and therefore the performance depends on the optimization of the driver.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 includes the Avivo HD called video technology including an onboard soundchip for 7.1 sound output over HDMI or DisplayPort and the 2nd generation UVD (Unified Video Decoder). This UVD 2 supports full bitstream decoding of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC and VC-1 streams. In addition to this, it also supports dual video stream decoding and Picture-in Picture mode which makes the UVD full BD-Live compliant. Simplified, the Avivo HD technology handles all video tasks and enables the GPU to decode HD videos.

The HD4830 was replaced by the Mobility Radeon HD 5830, which features a higher shader count (800) and DirectX 11 capable shaders. Therefore, the gaming performance of the 5830 is better, but also the power consumption should be higher (same 40nm process, although more mature).

Compared to the desktop cards, the Mobility Radeon is similar to the ATI Radeon HD 4730. Still, the desktop 4730 offers a noticeable higher performance due to GDDR5 usage and higher clock speeds.

 

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

The NVIDIA Quadro K1000M (or Quadro K1100M, due to the internal code name 1100M) is a mid-range, DirectX 11.1-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK107 architecture and is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC. Compared to the K2000M, the K1000M only features 192 shader cores of 384. The Quadro K1000M is built for the Intel Chief River generation (Ivy Bridge) and is the successor to the Fermi-based Quadro 1000M (Huron River platform).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK107 Kepler core offers two shader blocks, called SMX, each with 192 shaders for a total of 384 shader cores that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. The K1000M, however, offers only one SMX with 192 shaders. Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are still expected to be up to twice as power efficient. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip are about as fast as one shader of a Fermi chip (as the latter is clocked twice as fast).

PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and an optional Turbo mode can automatically overclock the Nvidia card by a theoretical 15 percent if the laptop cooling system allows it. The implementation of this boost mode is done in the BIOS, but it is ultimately dependent upon the manufacturer of the laptop.

Performance

The performance is similar to the consumer GeForce GT 630M and above the older Quadro 1000M. Most 3D games of 2012 can be played fluently in medium settings an resolutions.

Features

The improved feature set now includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK107 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENC API.

The power consumption of the K1000M is rated at 45 Watt (TGP according to Nvidia) and is therefore suited for medium-sized notebooks 15-inches or greater.

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Quadro K Series
Mobility Radeon HD 4860 compare 640 @ 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 compare 800 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 850 MHz
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 640 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro K5100M compare 1536 @ 0.77 GHz256 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Quadro K5000M compare 1344 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K4100M compare 1152 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K4000M compare 960 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K3100M compare 768 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K3000M compare 576 @ 0.65 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K2100M compare 576 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K1100M compare 384 @ 0.71 GHz128 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K620M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Quadro K2000M compare 384 @ 0.75 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K1000M 192 @ 0.85 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K610M compare 192 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 2600 MHz
Quadro K510M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 2400 MHz
Quadro K500M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameM97N14P-Q1
ArchitectureTerascale 1Kepler
Pipelines640 - unified192 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz850 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, DDR3DDR3
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.1
Transistors826 Million
technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesPowerplay, CrossFireX support, Optimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement03.03.2009 01.06.2012
Information512 - 768 GFlops Computing Power
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.com
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Power Consumption45 Watt

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1200     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1264 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1082     avg: 1102     median: 1102 (1%)     max: 1122 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3863 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
min: 4978     avg: 5165     median: 5164.5 (1%)     max: 5351 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3200 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
min: 4197     avg: 4229     median: 4229 (2%)     max: 4261 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
14938 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
3DMark 06
7155 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
min: 8116     avg: 8341     median: 8340.5 (11%)     max: 8565 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
3DMark 06
8380 Points (11%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
15.4 fps (3%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 17.43     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (11%)     max: 18.34 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 21.17     avg: 21.8     median: 21.8 (12%)     max: 22.34 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 28.89     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (23%)     max: 30.9 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 10.36     avg: 11.6     median: 11.6 (14%)     max: 12.92 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 37.39     avg: 38.1     median: 38.1 (29%)     max: 38.85 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 41.3     avg: 42.8     median: 42.7 (46%)     max: 44.19 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 11.61     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (6%)     max: 13.77 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 22.79     avg: 22.9     median: 22.9 (12%)     max: 22.94 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (85%)     max: 6.8 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (85%)     max: 6.8 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4250 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
min: 6695     avg: 6750     median: 6750 (5%)     max: 6805 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 26.02     avg: 26.3     median: 26.3 (9%)     max: 26.64 fps

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro K1000M → 135% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
66 108 ~ 87 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
26 34 ~ 30 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
11 14 ~ 13 fps
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
114  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
91  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
53  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
92  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
54  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
10  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
81 84 ~ 83 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
54 55 ~ 55 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
46 49 ~ 48 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
25 28 ~ 27 fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
64 65 ~ 65 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
25 26 ~ 26 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
19 19 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
9  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
92  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
65  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
30  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
14  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
82  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K1000M:
30  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
14  fps
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
112  fps
med. 1280x720
Quadro K1000M:
21.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
7.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
254  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro K1000M:
48  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro K1000M:
30  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K1000M:
14  fps
low 800x600
Quadro K1000M:
52  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro K1000M:
28  fps
high 1600x900
Quadro K1000M:
9  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
64.8  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
36.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
24.6  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
132.3  fps
206%
Quadro K1000M:
273  fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro K1000M:
31  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
Quadro K1000M:
693  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
129  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro K1000M:
68  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
168.1  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
88.1  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
169.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
61.5  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
43.1  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
35.7  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
99.4  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
59.2  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
32.3  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
106.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
54.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Mobility Radeon HD 4830:
27.5  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
Quadro K1000M:
98 105 ~ 102 fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro K1000M:
112 123 ~ 118 fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro K1000M:
31 33 ~ 32 fps

Average Gaming ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro K1000M → 206%

NVIDIA Quadro K1000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
World of Tanks v887302213
Torchlight 21149153
Dirt Showdown92543310
Diablo III83554827
Anno 20706526199
Batman: Arkham City92653014
Deus Ex Human Revolution823014
Total War: Shogun 211221.57.1
StarCraft 2254483014
Metro 203352289
Anno 140427331
Sims 369312968
World of Warcraft10211832
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
9
3
3
4
3
1
3
6
1
8
2







ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Need for Speed Shift64.836.7224.6
Anno 1404132.3
F.E.A.R. 2168.188.1
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare169.761.5
Supreme Commander - FA Bench43.0535.73
Crysis - GPU Benchmark99.459.232.31
Crysis - CPU Benchmark106.954.427.53
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
3

4
2
2
2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 06. 06:20:24

#0 checking url part for id 1120 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3238 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.236s ... 0.237s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.237s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.237s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1120 +0.044s ... 0.281s

#8 got single benchmarks 1120 +0.012s ... 0.294s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3238 +0.002s ... 0.296s

#10 got single benchmarks 3238 +0.016s ... 0.311s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.311s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.28s ... 0.592s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.592s

#14 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.6s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.6s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.613s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.05s ... 0.663s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.663s

#19 return log +0.063s ... 0.727s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)