, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-T720 MP4 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP6 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP2

ARM Mali-T720 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T720 MP4

The ARM Mali-T720 MP4 (or T724) is a mobile graphics solution found in many ARM SoCs. The chip has been available since Q1/2015 in the Mediatek MT6753 and other low-end SoCs. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 and DirectX 11 FL9_3. 

The T720 MP4 offers 4 shader clusters at up to 600 MHz (40.8 GFLOPS). Therefore, the GPU should perform slightly worse than an Adreno 405 or PowerVR G6200. Modern Android games should therefore run fluently in 720p.

The GPU is typically built for smartphone SoCs in 28nm.

ARM Mali-T760 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP6

The ARM Mali-T760 MP6 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the Exynos 5433 Octa SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP6 version offers 6 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (143 GFLOPS). According to first benchmarks, the performance is similar to the Adreno 420 and PowerVR GX6450. Therfore, even very demanding games of 2014 should run in high resolutions fluently.

ARM Mali-T760 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP2

The ARM Mali-T760 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the MediaTek MT6752 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP2 version offers 2 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (48 GFLOPS). Therefore, it only offers one third of the theoretical performance of the T760MP6 version. The gaming performance should be similar to the Adreno 405 or PowerVR G6200. Therefore, it is situated in the middle class in 2014 and all games of that year should run fluently.

Due to the only 2 cores, the GPU is also suited for small tablets and smartphones.

ARM Mali-T720 MP4ARM Mali-T760 MP6ARM Mali-T760 MP2
ManufacturerARMARMARM
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)
Pipelines4 - unified6 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed600 (Boost) MHz700 MHz700 MHz
Shared Memorynonono
DirectXDirectX 11 (FL 9_3)DirectX 11DirectX 11.1
technology28 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAA
Date of Announcement30.10.2013 01.10.2013 01.10.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...http://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CPU in Mali-T720 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67538 x 1500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
CPU in Mali-T760 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa8 x 1900 MHz? MHz700 MHz
CPU in Mali-T760 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT87528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT67528 x 1700 MHz? MHz700 MHz
Mediatek MT87324 x 1500 MHz? MHz500 MHz
min. - max.? MHz500 - 700 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2581     avg: 5872     median: 6250 (1%)     max: 6705 Points
min: 20006     avg: 20244     median: 20244 (3%)     max: 20482 Points
min: 7352     avg: 8363     median: 8041 (1%)     max: 10019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1655     avg: 3350     median: 3893.5 (1%)     max: 3959 Points
min: 4310     avg: 4909     median: 4794.5 (1%)     max: 6047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 3359     avg: 6578     median: 7561 (1%)     max: 7832 Points
min: 8765     avg: 9158     median: 9135 (1%)     max: 9573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
286 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
238 Points (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 4.9     avg: 11.2     median: 12 (0%)     max: 13 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP6
min: 24     avg: 31     median: 31 (0%)     max: 38 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
min: 13.2     avg: 16.1     median: 16 (0%)     max: 19.2 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 8.6     avg: 14.8     median: 12 (0%)     max: 21 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP6
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP2
min: 11     avg: 18.8     median: 19.3 (1%)     max: 25.7 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1.6     avg: 4     median: 4.2 (0%)     max: 4.8 fps
min: 10.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 17 fps
min: 1     avg: 4.4     median: 5 (1%)     max: 6.1 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 3.6     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (3%)     max: 12 fps
min: 4.9     avg: 8.1     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 13.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
0 fps (0%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 31.7     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (60%)     max: 41.48 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 4327     avg: 4514     median: 4513.5 (10%)     max: 4700 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 10969     avg: 11318     median: 11318 (25%)     max: 11667 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 53     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (80%)     max: 54.4 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3808     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (4%)     max: 3955 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1250     avg: 1275     median: 1274.5 (3%)     max: 1299 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3286     avg: 3756     median: 3755.5 (82%)     max: 4225
min: 3843     avg: 4239     median: 4320 (94%)     max: 4489

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T720 MP4 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP6 → 254% n=6

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP2 → 137% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.16
log 28. 13:43:27

#0 checking url part for id 6460 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5984 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5997 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:22:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6460 +0.044s ... 0.092s

#9 got single benchmarks 6460 +0.01s ... 0.102s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 5984 +0s ... 0.103s

#11 got single benchmarks 5984 +0.007s ... 0.109s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 5997 +0s ... 0.11s

#13 got single benchmarks 5997 +0.014s ... 0.124s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.133s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.133s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.137s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.137s

#19 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.145s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.146s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)