MSI CX600
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the MSI CX600
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionA decent laptop that should serve most people's needs, but battery life is poor. MSI's C series is targeted at those after an everyday computing solution. The CX600-064UK is a part of that series and provides decent performance, an interesting design and mixed portability. Despite a few minor flaws – namely the battery life and keyboard – the MSI CX600- 064UK is a decent machine which should cater for most people's needs.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2010
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet
Archive.org versionLast time we checked, the credit crunch had morphed into something of a recession, forcing everyone, tech-hungry geeks included, to re-evaluate what could be considered affordable.
The MSI CX600 offers fabulous value for money. It's fast, well-equipped and even has a discrete graphics card -- a feature many budget laptops can only dream of. Its only drawbacks, in our opinion, are that it isn't very attractive and lacks an HDMI output
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2009
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/18/2009
Rating: Total score: 49% price: 90% performance: 53% features: 72% mobility: 20% ergonomy: 21%
Source: c't - 21/09

Comparison, , Very Long, Date: 10/01/2009
Rating: performance: 65% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 30% ergonomy: 40% emissions: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/18/2009
Rating: Total score: 49% price: 90% performance: 53% features: 72% mobility: 20% ergonomy: 21%
Source: Komputer for alle
DA→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/06/2010
Rating: Total score: 40%
Comment
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330: Lower clocked Radeon 4530 with a current consumption of 7 Watt (according to AMD). Supports DirectX 10.1 and Avivo HD for HD video acceleration.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
T6500:
Entry level Penryn based dual-core CPU with a small 2MB level 2 cache and FSB800. Similar to the T6570 but without VT-x.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.




