Acer Aspire 5810TG

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Acer Aspire 5810TG

60% Acer Aspire 5810TG-354932Mn review
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
A large yet portable laptop, offering good quality but a disappointing battery

The Aspire 5810TG is a good laptop, that will suit commuters wanting a larger machine. It lacks the power and battery life of the other laptops here, however, although its impressive quality and comfort round off the specification and compensate somewhat.

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2009
Rating: Total score: 60%

Foreign Reviews

Acer Aspire 5810TG - Flachmann im 15-Zoll-Gewand
Source: HardwareLuxx DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2009
Rating: mobility: 60%

90% Ausdauerspieler
Source: TV Movie Multimedia - 24/09
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80%

Leichte Vollkost
Source: c't - 19/09
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/01/2009
Rating: performance: 35% display: 75% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 80%

Acer Aspire 5810TG
Source: Hardware.info NL→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2009
Rating: performance: 60% mobility: 80%

Comment

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330: Lower clocked Radeon 4530 with a current consumption of 7 Watt (according to AMD). Supports DirectX 10.1 and Avivo HD for HD video acceleration.

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.

SU9400:

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU and/or Screen Size

Devices with the same GPU

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight