Notebookcheck Logo

Lenovo G50-80 Notebook Review

No frills. Visually, the G50 doesn't stray from the typical look we've come to expect from Lenovo. The internal components are solid and while the notebook isn't what we'd call a highlight, it's a very decent package overall.

For the original German review, see here.

Lenovo's G50-series is designed to handle all the tasks a user might encounter on a daily basis. The models in the series start at under 300 Euro (~$330), although at this price point they are equipped with hardware from AMD. Our 15.6-inch review notebook is more upscale and comes with Core i5 processor, 8 GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSHD. At the time of writing, this configuration sells for 615 Euro (~$675). A model with half the storage and RAM sells for 15 Euro (~$16.50) less. On their website, Lenovo references other versions with Intel Core i7 CPU and BluRay optical drive, but these models weren't available for purchase in the online store at the time of our check. The competition in the realm of entry-level notebooks such as this one is pretty extensive, so we'll compare the review candidate to other notebooks like the Medion Akoya E6418.

Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE (G50 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-5257U 2 x 2.7 - 3.1 GHz, Broadwell, dual-core
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Core: 800 MHz, 20.19.15.4331
Memory
8 GB 
, dual-channel, PC3L-12800 DDR3L 1600 MHz
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, LG Philips LGD0468 LP156WHB-TPC1, TN, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Broadwell-U PCH-LP (Premium)
Storage
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 8 GB SSD cache
Soundcard
Intel Broadwell PCH-LP - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: audio combo-jack, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3160 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
DVD-RW DA8A5SH
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 384 x 265 ( = 0.98 x 15.12 x 10.43 in)
Battery
32 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD webcam
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers,, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.3 kg ( = 81.13 oz / 5.07 pounds), Power Supply: 290 g ( = 10.23 oz / 0.64 pounds)
Price
615 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case & Connectivity

The chassis is made entirely out of plastic. Except for the lid, all surfaces feature a matte finish. The smooth and glossy display lid sparkles slightly and is very susceptible to fingerprints. Another drawback: the back of the display yields to pressure rather easily.

Closer examination reveals a lot of edges and sharp corners but the build quality is solid overall. We don't think the chassis would survive drops, however.

The two display hinges don't seem to be quite sturdy enough. They move effortlessly, but unfortunately can't prevent the display from bouncing.

At a weight of 2.3 kg and a height of 2.5 cm, the notebook isn't a high-end slim-and-light, but slipping the G50 into a bag doesn't pose a problem.

In addition to a large maintenance hatch, the battery features a rather simple removal mechanism. The maintenance cover features a simple screw mechanism as well.

left side power jack, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, 1 x USB 2.0, 1 x USB 3.0
left side power jack, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, 1 x USB 2.0, 1 x USB 3.0
right side: audio combo-jack, SD card reader, USB 2.0, Kensington lock slot
right side: audio combo-jack, SD card reader, USB 2.0, Kensington lock slot

Input Devices

input devices Lenovo G50
input devices Lenovo G50

Visually, the keyboard looks familiar, since Lenovo uses the same design for other notebooks (for example the IdealPad G50-70). The size of the keys is ideal and the surface slightly rough to the touch. Because the key travel is rather short and the feedback on the soft side, faster inputs in particular feel a little spongy. For occasional word processing and similar tasks the keyboard is definitely sufficient, however. A drawback remains: the keyboard yields to pressure easily towards the middle.

The touchpad is adequately sized at 10.1 x 5.4 cm and translates inputs without a hitch. Multi-touch gestures are recognized well most of the time. A problem area are the corners, since finger movements aren't always interpreted correctly. The mouse buttons feature soft feedback and long travel.

Display

subpixel array
subpixel array

Unfortunately, the matte display panel is based on inexpensive TN technology with limited viewing angle stability and an HD resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels. Colors and brightness suffer when the user moves his or her head. The brightness could be higher as well - we measured an average of 224.8 cd/m². Lenovo doesn't offer an alternative panel. The contrast of 466:1 and a black value of 0.47 cd/m² are not quite good enough to display solid blacks. The Medion Akoya E6418 features an average brightness of Test Aldi/Medion Akoya E6418 Notebook230 cd/m², which isn't much better, but makes use of a high-end IPS Full-HD panel instead. Combined with a black value of 0.25 cd/m² and a corresponding contrast ratio of 948:1, the competing notebook is an interesting alternative.

241
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LGD0468 LP156WHB-TPC1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 241 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 224.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 178 cd/m²
Contrast: 466:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.19 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.94% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
Acer Aspire ES1-521-87DN
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-6410, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPVX
Asus ASUSPRO Essential P2520LA-XO0167H
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
Display
-5%
-3%
-6%
Display P3 Coverage
40.94
38.96
-5%
39.83
-3%
38.55
-6%
sRGB Coverage
61.6
58.5
-5%
59.5
-3%
57.8
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
42.29
40.25
-5%
41.19
-3%
39.84
-6%
Response Times
46%
-1%
-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46 ?(22, 24)
9 ?(8, 10)
80%
47 ?(23, 24)
-2%
48 ?(25, 23)
-4%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(9, 17)
23 ?(24, 22)
12%
26 ?(9, 17)
-0%
26 ?(9, 17)
-0%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(50, 50)
1000 ?(90)
198 ?(90)
Screen
29%
8%
5%
Brightness middle
219
237
8%
245
12%
228
4%
Brightness
225
230
2%
238
6%
220
-2%
Brightness Distribution
89
80
-10%
88
-1%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.47
0.25
47%
0.42
11%
0.42
11%
Contrast
466
948
103%
583
25%
543
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
12.25
5.52
55%
10.49
14%
10.22
17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.19
4.7
64%
11.47
13%
11.08
16%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.41 91%
2.52 87%
2.46 89%
CCT
14272 46%
7230 90%
13286 49%
12762 51%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
37
-5%
38
-3%
37
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
58
-6%
60
-3%
58
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
16.84
Total Average (Program / Settings)
23% / 24%
1% / 5%
-1% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Next we take a look at the output of the CalMAN software. Subjectively, the panel of the review notebook exhibits a distinctly bluish hue and the measured DeltaE-deviations for colors (12,25) and graylevels (13,19) are far from great - something to be expected considering this is an inexpensive TN panel.

Outdoor suitability is limited in two ways: firstly, because the brightness isn't very high and secondly, because the display is highly reflective. For this reason, we only recommend using the G50-80 in the shade.

sRGB color space
sRGB color space
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN SaturationSweeps
CalMAN SaturationSweeps
AdobeRGB color space
AdobeRGB color space

Performance

Hardware-wise, Lenovo has the basics covered for multimedia and office applications. The Intel i5 processor is supported by 8 GB of DDR3 RAM running in dual-channel mode. Data finds its home on the 1 TB SSHD. As we mentioned earlier, not all of the (supposedly available) versions of the notebook can be purchased in Lenovo's online store.

Processor

The Broadwell-generation Intel Core i5-5257U is designed for a lower power consumption with a TDP of 28 watts according to Intel's spec sheet. Even fairly demanding programs and multitasking should not pose a problem. The two cores operate at 2.7 GHz but can be overclocked to up to 3.1 GHz via the Turbo. We use the Cinebench R15 benchmark to check the efficiency of the CPU and its performance under load. During the test, the CPU is not able to operate at the Turbo-induced maximum. After a few seconds, the clock speed drops to 2.7 GHz with the CPU stabilizing at 2.8 GHz after a while. The Medion Akoya E6418 does better here even though it contains the same processor. Operating the notebook on battery power results in a significant performance drop down to 200 points. The culprit is the clock speed: the CPU now operates between 1800 and 2000 MHz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE
278 Points
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620
316 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
321 Points +15%
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE
115 Points
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620
124 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
126 Points +10%

Legend

 
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE Intel Core i5-5257U, Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
 
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620 Intel Core i5-5257U, Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
 
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Core i5-5257U, Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Apple SSD SM0128G
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7781
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10309
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4684
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
23.37 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.21 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.24 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
29.16 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
278 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
115 Points
Help

System Performance

Working with the G50 is a fairly smooth experience thanks to the choice of hardware components. The SSHD allows for quicker reaction times compared to a regular HDD, although the 8 GB of integrated SSD cache can't compete with a real SSD. Our review notebook does well running the PCMark 8 Home benchmark and the results are similar to those of the predecessor. 

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
3364 Points
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
3460 Points +3%
PCMark 7 Score
4259 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3364 points
Help

Storage Devices

Lenovo uses a 1 TB SSHD drive with 8 GB of SSD cache. The transfer rates are similar to other 5400 RPM drives. The Medion Akoya E6418 with its 128 GB SSD is quite a bit faster as far as the important 4K read and write rates are concerned.

Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
Sequential Read: 114.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 114.9 MB/s
512K Read: 41.43 MB/s
512K Write: 68.4 MB/s
4K Read: 0.546 MB/s
4K Write: 1.081 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 1.324 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 0.955 MB/s

GPU Performance

For graphics duties, Lenovo relies on the processor-integrated Intel Iris Graphics 6100. The Broadwell-generation GPU should be sufficient for normal multimedia tasks and can even handle some older games. The results of the 3DMark 11 benchmark trail those of the Medion Akoya E6418, which features the same hardware. The picture was reversed when we ran 3DMark Ice Storm, however.

Unlike the processor, the GPU maintains its peak performance even when the notebook is used away from any outlets.

For further comparisons with the Intel GPU please check our comparison of current notebook graphics cards.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE
1581 Points
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620
1768 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
1828 Points +16%

Legend

 
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE Intel Core i5-5257U, Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
 
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620 Intel Core i5-5257U, Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
 
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Core i5-5257U, Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Apple SSD SM0128G
3DMark 11 Performance
1581 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
60813 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5881 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
829 points
Help

Gaming Performance

At least FIFA-sessions won't fall through, since the game remains playable even at high settings. Most titles released in the last few years require low settings to remain stutter-free, however. For details about those titles please check our article on laptop graphics cards and gaming performance.

FIFA 16 - 1366x768 High Preset AA:2x MS (sort by value)
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
37.1 fps
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
37.2 fps 0%
low med. high ultra
FIFA 16 (2015) 51.2 37.1
Anno 2205 (2015) 28.9 15.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 9.7
XCOM 2 (2016) 13.1

Emissions & Energy

System Noise

The integrated fan remains unobtrusive during both idle and load scenarios. Even during the 3D benchmark tests, the notebook remained very quiet. We recorded a maximum noise level of 34.5 dB. The Medion Akoya E6418 isn't much louder though at 40 dB.

Noise Level

Idle
32.2 / 32.3 / 32.3 dB(A)
HDD
32.2 dB(A)
DVD
35.5 / dB(A)
Load
34.5 / 34.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31.3 dB(A)

Temperature

stress test
stress test

Positive as well: the G50 is not only behaves well as far as the noise level is concerned, but the temperatures are well-controlled as well. The plastic chassis remains below 23 °C during idle and doesn't get any hotter than 35.8 °C under load.

Next we took a look at what's happening inside. To subject our review notebooks to maximum load levels, we use the tools Prime95 and FurMark. At the start of the test, the CPU cores throttled down to between 1.4 - 1.5 GHz and remained there for the duration of the test. The average recorded processor-temperature remained low at only about 56 °C.

Max. Load
 34.8 °C
95 F
28.1 °C
83 F
24.8 °C
77 F
 
 35.9 °C
97 F
32.1 °C
90 F
25 °C
77 F
 
 29.6 °C
85 F
34.5 °C
94 F
31.2 °C
88 F
 
Maximum: 35.9 °C = 97 F
Average: 30.7 °C = 87 F
24.9 °C
77 F
26 °C
79 F
33 °C
91 F
25 °C
77 F
32 °C
90 F
35.8 °C
96 F
29.6 °C
85 F
31.5 °C
89 F
30.6 °C
87 F
Maximum: 35.8 °C = 96 F
Average: 29.8 °C = 86 F
Power Supply (max.)  48.9 °C = 120 F | Room Temperature 22.8 °C = 73 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.5 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).

Speakers

pink noise speaker
pink noise speaker

The volume of the speakers is adequate. Mids are definitely over-emphasized, but the sound quality is at least good enough for YouTube videos.  

Power Consumption

The fairly frugal processor positively impacts the power consumption. During idle, the review notebook required between 6.3 and 8.5 watts; power draw under load was up to 33 watts. The competing notebook requires up to 12.5 watts more. The explanation: the G50 throttles under load, so the CPU never draws as much as it theoretically could.

Standby requires 0.48 watts, which is about twice as much as when the notebook is turned off completely (0.25 watts). 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.25 / 0.48 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.3 / 7 / 8.5 Watt
Load midlight 32 / 33 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Life

The G50-80 is equipped with a four-cell battery with a capacity of 31.7 Wh. To get an idea of the practically relevant battery life, we check the run time while running a browser test. The review notebook shut down after a tad over three hours. The Medion Akoya, on the other hand, lasted about 1.5 hours longer.

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing (sort by value)
Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
190 min
Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620
Iris Graphics 6100, 5257U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
276 min +45%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
3h 10min

Pros

+ system performance
+ temperature control
+ fan noise

Cons

- lower performance on battery
- throttling
- display brightness
- build quality

Verdict

In review: Lenovo G50. Test model courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo G50. Test model courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

New, but an old acquaintance: Lenovo's G50-80 features a previous-generation chassis. Aside from a few minor flaws surrounding the build quality, the overall impression is a good one. The TN panel isn't exactly a standout feature, though: the competitor Medion Akoya ships with a higher-end IPS panel for the same price.

The notebook does well as far as the system performance is concerned. The G50 handles all daily tasks well and the components still have some power to spare. Emissions are outstanding, but the battery life is pretty modest. Once again, the Medion Akoya outperforms the Lenovo offering here.

The Lenovo G50 might have some weaknesses, but the notebook is still well-equipped to handle various multimedia tasks.

We also recommend taking a look at the Medion Akoya E6418 - which retails for the same price - or the more powerful version of the G50, which sells for about 15 Euro (~$16.50) more.

Lenovo G50-80 80E5039SGE - 02/11/2016 v4.1(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis
67 / 98 → 68%
Keyboard
72%
Pointing Device
72%
Connectivity
71 / 81 → 88%
Weight
61 / 20-67 → 87%
Battery
79%
Display
72%
Games Performance
77 / 85 → 91%
Application Performance
84 / 92 → 91%
Temperature
93%
Noise
92 / 95 → 97%
Audio
64%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
73%
78%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-03- 2 (Update: 2018-05-15)