Notebookcheck Logo

Lenovo E31-80 (6200U, HD) Laptop Review

Mobile companion. Lenovo's 13.3-inch laptop delivers good battery runtimes, a solid-state disk and a quiet system noise. It uses Windows 10 Pro as the operating system. The incorporated display is not convincing.

The Lenovo E31-80 is a 13.3-inch office notebook. We are already familiar with the computer. It is the similarly designed successor of the Lenovo E31-70, which we have already had under review. Changes can be found inside: While the E31-70 series comes with Broadwell processors, the E31-80 series uses Skylake processors. The competition includes devices such as the Asus X302UV, the Acer Aspire ES1-332, the Medion Akoya S3409, and the HP ProBook 430 G4.

Since the E31-70 and the E31-80 use the same design, we will not cover case, connectivity, input devices, and speakers in detail here. Information about these are available in our Lenovo E31-70 review.

Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE (E31 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 950 MHz, single-channel, 21.20.16.4550
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR3-1600, single-channel, one RAM slot (used)
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 118 PPI, AU Optronics B133XTN01.6, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
Soundcard
Realtek ALC236 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audiocontroller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: audio combo, Card Reader: SD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.5 x 320 x 230 ( = 0.85 x 12.6 x 9.06 in)
Battery
35 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, MS Office 365 (trial version), McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.59 kg ( = 56.09 oz / 3.51 pounds), Power Supply: 292 g ( = 10.3 oz / 0.64 pounds)
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

328 mm / 12.9 in 234 mm / 9.21 in 25.6 mm / 1.008 in 1.6 kg3.51 lbs330 mm / 13 in 233.5 mm / 9.19 in 19.8 mm / 0.78 in 1.6 kg3.48 lbs327 mm / 12.9 in 228 mm / 8.98 in 20.7 mm / 0.815 in 1.5 kg3.31 lbs327 mm / 12.9 in 220.6 mm / 8.69 in 16.8 mm / 0.661 in 1.5 kg3.31 lbs320 mm / 12.6 in 230 mm / 9.06 in 21.5 mm / 0.846 in 1.6 kg3.51 lbs320 mm / 12.6 in 230 mm / 9.06 in 21.5 mm / 0.846 in 1.6 kg3.49 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
 
76.5 MB/s +194%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
 
27.9 MB/s +7%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
 
26 MB/s
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
 
19.1 MB/s -27%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
 
16.5 MB/s -37%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
 
10.3 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
 
87.4 MB/s +247%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
 
37.1 MB/s +47%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
 
37 MB/s +47%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
 
29.93 MB/s +19%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
 
25.2 MB/s
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
 
17.7 MB/s -30%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
321 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
291 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
438 MBit/s
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
314 MBit/s
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
277 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
385 MBit/s
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
325 MBit/s
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
216 MBit/s

Display

Pixel grid
Pixel grid

The matte 13.3-inch display features a native resolution of 1366x768 pixels. Brightness (222.4 cd/m²) and contrast (433:1) are disappointing. We expect better results. Pro: The display does not show PWM flickering at all.

225
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
220
cd/m²
211
cd/m²
204
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B133XTN01.6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 234 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 222.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 234 cd/m²
Contrast: 433:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3"
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
TN, 1366x768, 13.3"
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3"
Asus X302UV-FN016T
TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3"
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
32%
20%
30%
64%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
37.35
49.25
32%
44.72
20%
48.37
30%
64.6
73%
38.55
3%
sRGB Coverage
56.2
73.5
31%
67.3
20%
72.6
29%
87.3
55%
57.8
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
38.58
50.9
32%
46.2
20%
49.98
30%
63.8
65%
39.85
3%
Response Times
11%
-2%
9%
14%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(25, 19)
44.4 ?(22.8, 21.6)
-1%
39 ?(20, 19)
11%
42 ?(20, 22)
5%
34 ?(15, 19)
23%
42.4 ?(15.6, 26.8)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(20, 6)
20.4 ?(14, 6.4)
22%
30 ?(12, 18)
-15%
23 ?(6, 17)
12%
25 ?(8, 17)
4%
26.4 ?(6.4, 20)
-2%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(90)
1000 ?(90)
50 ?(90)
Screen
7%
3%
25%
35%
32%
Brightness middle
234
206
-12%
255
9%
218
-7%
295
26%
253
8%
Brightness
222
200
-10%
232
5%
210
-5%
283
27%
249
12%
Brightness Distribution
87
84
-3%
82
-6%
88
1%
88
1%
92
6%
Black Level *
0.54
0.6
-11%
0.52
4%
0.5
7%
0.65
-20%
0.32
41%
Contrast
433
343
-21%
490
13%
436
1%
454
5%
791
83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
12.09
9.2
24%
13.12
-9%
3.89
68%
4
67%
5.28
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.25
14.8
27%
22.98
-13%
7.11
65%
7.26
64%
13.66
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13
10.94
16%
15.01
-15%
4.9
62%
3.38
74%
3.8
71%
Gamma
2.78 79%
2.76 80%
2.41 91%
2.41 91%
2.38 92%
2.3 96%
CCT
15562 42%
13282 49%
24382 27%
7860 83%
6520 100%
6646 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
46.92
30%
43
19%
46
28%
57
58%
36.7
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
73.36
31%
68
21%
73
30%
85
52%
57.6
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 12%
7% / 6%
21% / 24%
38% / 38%
12% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The DeltaE-2000 shift is 12.09 in the state of delivery (target value smaller than 3). In addition, the display has a distinguished bluish cast.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Color saturation
CalMAN - Color saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Lenovo has equipped the E31-80 with a viewing-angle dependent TN panel. Thus, the screen is not legible from every position. You can only use the computer outdoors when the sun is not shining too brightly.

Outdoor use (on an overcast day)
Outdoor use (on an overcast day)

Performance

With the E31-80, Lenovo offers a 13.3-inch office notebook. The incorporated processor delivers enough performance for office and Internet applications. Our test model costs about 600 Euros (~$644). Other configurations are also available. Currently, the cheapest representative of the series is available for about 480 Euros (~$515).

Processor

Intel's Core i5-6200U (Skylake) dual core processor can be found inside. It is a mid-range CPU, which should meet the requirements of most users. The processor is one of the efficient ULV models (TDP: 15 watts). The CPU features a base clock of 2.3 GHz. The Turbo can increase the clock rate to 2.7 GHz (both cores) or 2.8 GHz (only one core). It is used in mains operation and on battery.

We check whether the Turbo is used permanently by running the Multithread test of Cinebench R15 in a loop for about 30 minutes. The results of the E31-80 are consistent without exception. Hence, a performance loss does not occur. 

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4363
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9795
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6961
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
287 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
23.59 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
144 Points +24%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
144 Points +24%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points -1%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
83 Points -28%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points -54%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
344 Points +20%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
341 Points +19%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points +1%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
287 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
209 Points -27%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points -43%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
12658 Points +29%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
9940 Points +1%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
9795 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
7048 Points -28%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
5284 Points -46%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
5668 Points +30%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
4400 Points +1%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
4363 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
3144 Points -28%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1677 Points -62%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
3429 Points +33%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
2877 Points +12%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
2571 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1362 Points -47%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
7051 Points +27%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
6067 Points +9%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5553 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4425 Points -20%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
4108 Points +27%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
3225 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1555 Points -52%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
7798 Points +32%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5896 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4162 Points -29%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
3285 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
6126 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
244.6 Points +29%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
235 Points +24%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
197.5 Points +4%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
189.6 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
106.9 Points -44%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
89.1 Points -53%

System Performance

A fast solid-state disk and a powerful processor ensure a fast system, which achieves a good result in the PC Mark 8 Home benchmark. Overall, the computer delivers more than enough performance for office and Internet applications. It is not possible to improve the system performance. Lenovo has already maxed out the possibilities.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3393 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3554 Points +5%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
GeForce 920MX, 6200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3466 Points +2%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3393 Points
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Phison S10C-512G
3085 Points -9%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
2782 Points -18%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
2073 Points -39%

Storage Device

Lenovo has equipped the E31-80 with a solid-state disk from Samsung. It is a 2.5-inch model with a total capacity of 256 GB. About 170 GB is free on the system drive (C:) in the state of delivery. A further 22 GB (of about 25 GB) is available on the Lenovo Partition (D:). Drivers and the installation files of the pre-installed software are stored on the latter. The rest of the capacity is used by the Windows installation and the recovery partition. The transfer rates of the SSD are good.

Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Sequential Read: 522 MB/s
Sequential Write: 457.4 MB/s
512K Read: 398.1 MB/s
512K Write: 303.6 MB/s
4K Read: 35.05 MB/s
4K Write: 88 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 299.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 229.8 MB/s
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Hynix HFS128G3MND
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Phison S10C-512G
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-89%
-91%
-36%
8%
-18%
Read Seq
522
116.4
-78%
105.1
-80%
428.2
-18%
522
0%
505
-3%
Write Seq
457.4
120.7
-74%
103.1
-77%
178.6
-61%
384.4
-16%
328.9
-28%
Read 512
398.1
37.01
-91%
33.89
-91%
282.6
-29%
412
3%
313.6
-21%
Write 512
303.6
73.1
-76%
49.7
-84%
179.1
-41%
395.5
30%
301
-1%
Read 4k
35.05
0.507
-99%
0.386
-99%
6.559
-81%
34.07
-3%
21.69
-38%
Write 4k
88
4.156
-95%
1.095
-99%
71.2
-19%
100.9
15%
80.4
-9%
Read 4k QD32
299.7
0.967
-100%
0.91
-100%
253
-16%
316.3
6%
132.2
-56%
Write 4k QD32
229.8
0.652
-100%
1.149
-99%
174
-24%
286.4
25%
258.8
13%

Graphics Card

Intel's HD Graphics 520 GPU is responsible for video output. It supports DirectX 12 and works at 300 to 950 MHz. The results of the 3D Mark benchmarks are normal for this GPU. It is not possible to improve the graphics performance by adding a second RAM module (enables dual-channel mode), since the E31-80  features only one RAM slot.

3DMark 11 Performance
1348 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1747 Points +39%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1543 Points +23%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1463 Points +16%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1258 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
887 Points -29%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
583 Points -54%

Gaming Performance

The Lenovo computer can smoothly run a few games. This is primarily true for games with moderate hardware requirements. However, even such games require selecting low resolutions and quality settings. Current hits, such as “Mass Effect Andromeda” are not playable, since the performance of the CPU-GPU combination is far too low.

lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 35.4 21.1 17.2

Emissions & Energy

System Noise

In idle mode, the fan of the computer often stands still and the laptop falls silent. Even when the fan works at low speed in this scenario, it is not really audible. The fan does hardly get louder under load. We measure a noise level of 34.2 dB(A) during the stress test.

Noise Level

Idle
31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB(A)
Load
35.7 / 34.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.139.640.736.736.12536.337.937.133.736.33133.23333.131.133.24032.732.533.931.132.75032.933.132.829.932.96333.434.534.632.133.48029.432.132.629.829.410028.730.633.129.428.712526.625.928.125.226.616025.827.627.825.225.820025.527.227.324.925.525024.326.125.523.224.331523.325.425.822.523.340022.224.124.221.222.250021.823.323.620.721.863021.223.22319.621.280020.625.424.119.220.6100020.827.124.918.420.8125019.524.222.117.919.5160019.224.622.617.619.2200019.124.422.616.919.1250018.825.322.116.918.8315018.723.520.717.118.7400018.821.119.616.918.8500018.719.61916.718.7630018.71918.916.818.7800018.618.91916.618.61000018.518.718.816.618.51250018.418.518.516.418.41600018.518.718.616.418.5SPL31.935.734.230.231.9N1.72.42.21.41.7median 19.5median 24.2median 22.6median 17.9median 19.5Delta2.33.13.42.32.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE

Temperature

the Lenovo E31-80 during the stress test
the Lenovo E31-80 during the stress test

The E31-80 behaves the same way in our stress test (Prime95 and FurMark run for at least one hour) on mains operation and on battery. The processor works at 2.3 to 2.4 GHz at the beginning. Later, the clock rate falls slowly. After about one hour the clock rate is 2 GHz. The graphics core works at 900 to 950 MHz. Later the clock rate levels off at 950 MHz. The temperature increase remains within limits. During the stress test, it exceeds 40 °C (~104 °F) in three measurement segments.

Max. Load
 37 °C
99 F
40.2 °C
104 F
32 °C
90 F
 
 29 °C
84 F
37.6 °C
100 F
31.4 °C
89 F
 
 21.4 °C
71 F
22.5 °C
73 F
26 °C
79 F
 
Maximum: 40.2 °C = 104 F
Average: 30.8 °C = 87 F
31.3 °C
88 F
45 °C
113 F
38.2 °C
101 F
29.3 °C
85 F
44.5 °C
112 F
27.3 °C
81 F
26.2 °C
79 F
23.5 °C
74 F
22 °C
72 F
Maximum: 45 °C = 113 F
Average: 31.9 °C = 89 F
Power Supply (max.)  39.1 °C = 102 F | Room Temperature 20.6 °C = 69 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.3 °C / 4.1 F).
Temperature development upper side (load)
Temperature development upper side (load)
Temperature development underside (load)
Temperature development underside (load)
Temperature development upper side (idle)
Temperature development upper side (idle)
Temperature development underside (idle)
Temperature development underside (idle)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.536.741.52542.433.742.43141.431.141.44041.531.141.55044.529.944.56344.132.144.18045.929.845.910045.429.445.412546.425.246.416049.825.249.82005324.95325055.923.255.931564.622.564.640065.721.265.750065.320.765.363066.219.666.28006719.267100071.118.471.1125068.117.968.1160070.417.670.4200068.316.968.3250063.416.963.4315064.417.164.4400068.616.968.6500067.216.767.2630065.316.865.3800061.716.661.71000061.516.661.51250060.716.460.71600056.816.456.8SPL79.230.279.2N46.81.446.8median 64.6median 17.9median 64.6Delta5.22.35.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo E31-80 80MX0107GEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

The E31-80 does not show any anomalies in this respect. We measured a maximum power consumption of 7.5 watts in idle mode. During the stress test, it climbs to 26.4 watts. The power consumption would be higher if the CPU used its Turbo. The power adapter is rated at 45 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.47 / 0.48 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.6 / 6.8 / 7.5 Watt
Load midlight 26.9 / 26.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Battery Life

Our practical Wi-Fi test simulates the load needed to open websites via a script. The "Balanced" profile is enabled, the laptop's energy-savings functions are disabled, and the screen's brightness is set to approximately 150 cd/m². The E31-80 achieves a battery life of 7:02 h. Therewith; it surpasses the Broadwell predecessor by more than 3 hours.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 40)
7h 02min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
430 min +2%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 35 Wh
422 min
Asus X302UV-FN016T
6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh
392 min -7%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
365 min -14%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
278 min -34%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 35 Wh
254 min -40%

Pros

+ matte display
+ fast SSD
+ works quietly
+ good battery life

Cons

- dark, low-contrast, display with narrow viewing angles
- only 1 year warranty
- no Type-C USB

Verdict

In review: the Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE. Test model provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In review: the Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE. Test model provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Lenovo uses a Core i5 processor of the Skylake generation in the E31-80. It delivers sufficient performance for office and Internet applications. Compared to the Broadwell processors in the E31-70 series, the Skylake model performs only slightly better. The CPU has a higher impact on the battery runtimes.

The Skylake processor improves the battery runtimes significantly.

The computer works quietly and does not get too warm. A solid-state disk ensures a fast system. It is possible to replace the SSD, but this requires opening the case. The incorporated keyboard appeared good and suitable for frequent typing.

As in many notebooks, the display is the biggest weakness of the E31-80. Lenovo is using a dark, low-contrast model with narrow viewing angles. The display will not win prizes. The warranty period of only one year is  another point of criticism. We expect two years warranty these days. In addition, we are missing a Type-C USB port.

Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE - 04/19/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
78 /  98 → 80%
Keyboard
74%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
42 / 80 → 53%
Weight
68 / 35-78 → 77%
Battery
89%
Display
75%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
81 / 87 → 93%
Temperature
92 / 91 → 100%
Noise
91%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Average
71%
80%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Sascha Mölck, 2017-04-21 (Update: 2017-04-22)