Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

HiSilicon Kirin 659

► remove from comparison  Kirin 659

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.36 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz). The slightly older Kirin 658 is very similar. The 659 is in our benchmarks around 4% faster than the 658 and offers a better LTE radio (Cat. 13).

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at >=900 MHz), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 410 MSM8916

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 (MSM8916) is a ARM based mid-range SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in Dec. 2013 and was the first 64-Bit SoC by Qualcomm. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 (quad-core) processor cores, a Adreno 306 graphics card, a 64 Bit LPDDR2/3 memory controller and WLAN, Bluetooth, and UMTS/LTE radio.

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison  Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 659Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916HiSilicon Kirin 650
Series Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 « 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6302.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6262.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6252 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4392 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4501.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4292 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM89521.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v21.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM89391.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM89361.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4351.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM89291.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 « 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ80161.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2360 MHz1400 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 48 / 8
Technology16 nm28 nm16 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerAdreno 306 GPU, WLAN, Bluetooth, LTE, FM, NFC, GPS/GLOSNASS/BeiDou, 32/64 Bit LPDDR2/3 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 306 (450 MHz)ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12599 Points (10%)
11640 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11780     avg: 13618     median: 13379.5 (11%)     max: 14930 Points
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (11%)     max: 13676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1632     avg: 1675     median: 1685 (20%)     max: 1717 Points
0 Points (0%)
1440 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1354     avg: 1625     median: 1685 (19%)     max: 1741 Points
min: 579     avg: 688     median: 714 (8%)     max: 770 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 869     avg: 919     median: 926.5 (9%)     max: 946 Points
min: 515     avg: 516     median: 516 (5%)     max: 517 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3316     avg: 3608     median: 3680.5 (4%)     max: 3805 Points
min: 1261     avg: 1322     median: 1322 (1%)     max: 1383 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 887     avg: 888     median: 888 (12%)     max: 889 Points
391 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3438     avg: 3473     median: 3473 (8%)     max: 3508 Points
918 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3508 Points (5%)
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
876 Points (13%)
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (13%)     max: 906 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1170     avg: 1414     median: 1426 (3%)     max: 1563 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 462     avg: 479.7     median: 476 (9%)     max: 528 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
968 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2829 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5944 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3298 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3897 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8684     avg: 9440     median: 9271 (11%)     max: 10788 ms
min: 11843     avg: 14378     median: 13968 (16%)     max: 20618 ms
min: 9111     avg: 9254     median: 9254 (11%)     max: 9397 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1173 ms (13%)
min: 1022     avg: 1395     median: 1380 (15%)     max: 1760 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1262     avg: 1373     median: 1372.5 (13%)     max: 1483 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4191     avg: 4947     median: 4980 (4%)     max: 5471 Points
min: 1447     avg: 2659     median: 2737.5 (2%)     max: 3296 Points
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (4%)     max: 4756 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 34     avg: 38.7     median: 40 (8%)     max: 42 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 720     avg: 862     median: 799 (21%)     max: 1219 Points
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 966     avg: 1165     median: 1164 (26%)     max: 1313 Points
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 1929     avg: 2030     median: 2024 (27%)     max: 2139 Points
3356 Points (44%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 11992     avg: 13834     median: 13943.5 (32%)     max: 15455 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
20844 Points (48%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 20041     avg: 21467     median: 21313 (21%)     max: 23242 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 62810     avg: 65730     median: 66608 (23%)     max: 68232 Points
min: 18230     avg: 24859     median: 26409 (9%)     max: 28232 Points
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 7947     avg: 8633     median: 8430.5 (26%)     max: 9656 Points
3608 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 21484     avg: 23751     median: 24193.5 (30%)     max: 24268 Points
11411 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 12982     avg: 13331     median: 13167.5 (4%)     max: 14340 Points
1139 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 39451     avg: 41305     median: 41643.5 (25%)     max: 41874 Points
19618 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 81992     avg: 87019     median: 87511.5 (15%)     max: 89639 Points
35776 Points (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
1694 Iter./s (52%)
min: 403     avg: 540     median: 405 (12%)     max: 812 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
20418 Iter./s (67%)
min: 6416     avg: 7524     median: 7580 (25%)     max: 8577 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 122441     avg: 127602     median: 127602 (17%)     max: 132762 Points
min: 9346     avg: 10830     median: 9857 (1%)     max: 13288 Points
142543 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2413     avg: 2626     median: 2635 (14%)     max: 2819 Points
1635 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 5970     avg: 7032     median: 6957 (15%)     max: 8244 Points
2006 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4615     avg: 4805     median: 4834.5 (32%)     max: 4911 Points
min: 2217     avg: 2944     median: 2913 (19%)     max: 3701 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5704     avg: 5956     median: 5887 (29%)     max: 6252 Points
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
473 min (9%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 659 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 → 49% n=10

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 96% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 12. 18:53:50

#0 checking url part for id 9252 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4974 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:37:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.091s ... 0.092s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.092s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9252 +0.003s ... 0.095s

#8 got single benchmarks 9252 +0.022s ... 0.117s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 4974 +0.003s ... 0.12s

#10 got single benchmarks 4974 +0.055s ... 0.175s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0.003s ... 0.178s

#12 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.01s ... 0.188s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.188s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.064s ... 0.252s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.158s ... 0.41s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.41s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)