Huawei Ascend G525
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 3 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Ascend G525
More horsepower. An entry-level smartphone with a quad-core processor - Huawei combines these apparent contradictions in the 4.5-inch Ascend G525. We checked the performance of the Android smartphone for 250 Euros (~$345).
Source: Tech.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: dual SIM function; good dsplay; adequate performance
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/17/2014
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: respectable device; dual SIM function Negative: weak camera; small storage
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2013
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: 2 SIM card slots Negative: unconvincing android smartphone
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 84%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 203: Entry level GPU with support for OpenGL ES 2.0
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
S4 Play MSM8225Q: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
4.50":
This display is tiny. You will probably see very little on the screen and be able to use mini-resolutions.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. is a Chinese telecommunications company and hardware manufacturer founded in 1987 and headquartered in Shenzhen. Huawei is a global leader in information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. Huawei provides end-to-end solutions for telecommunications networks, devices, and smartphones, as well as storage, servers, networking, and cloud computing enterprise solutions and products.
In 2014, Huawei established the Honor subsidiary brand under which certain smartphone lines are sold. The Huawei name is usually not listed for these products.
73%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.