Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T vs Mediatek MT6750N

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

The Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T is an entry level ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets (mainly Android based) that was introduced in mid 2018. It integrates eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters. The four performance cores clock up to 2.3 GHz and the four efficiency cores clock up to 1.8 GHz (big.LITTLE). The integrated graphics card is called PowerVR GE8320. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x . Furthermore, a LTE radio with Cat-7 DL (300 Mbps download) and Cat-13 UL (150 Mbps upload) and a 802.11 a/b/g/n WiFi-5 modem is integrated. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET.

Mediatek MT6750N

► remove from comparison  MT6750N

The ARM-based Mediatek MT6750N SoC (System on a Chip) is a mid-range mobile processor for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores consisting of 4 high-performance cores clocked at up to 1.5 GHz plus 4 low-power cores clocked at up to 1 GHz each. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a Cat. 6 LTE radio and an ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU with 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity. Compared to the older MT6750, the graphics card seems to be clocked higher.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the Cortex-A7 and introduces 64-Bit support (ARMv8-ISA). Its performance-per-Watt is significantly higher and is even slightly ahead of the old Cortex-A9. If utilizing all 8 of its cores, the Cortex-A53 can rival competing mobile processes in the high-end class range. However, no practical software has been specifically coded to use all 8 cores at such high performance levels.

In addition to the CPU and GPU cores, the SoC also contains a memory controller and the aforementioned Cat.6 LTE modem (FDD/TDD, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE) with both 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth. The integrated video engine is able to record and playback 1080p videos at up to 30 FPS in hardware. Cameras are supported at up to 16 MP.

The MT6750 is still manufactured in 28nm and so power efficiency is not on par with modern 14/16nm chips.

ModelMediatek Helio P22T MT8768TMediatek MT6750N
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Clock2300 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm28 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4XCat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)ARM Mali-T860 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T Mediatek MT6750N

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
10.7 pt (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT6750N +
10044 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
443 Points (6%)
1031 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (12%)
1013 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (10%)
665 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (5%)
2645 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
172 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
12972 ms (15%)
14116 ms (17%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
5156 Points (5%)
3274 Points (3%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (9%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT6750N +
43987 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5120 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
3138 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 MT6750N +
1699 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 MT6750N +
2820 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT6750N +
3885 Points (19%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (14%)
012345Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
1.6 Watt (6%)
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.11.21.31.41.41.51.61.71.8Tooltip

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750N → 105% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 10:56:06

#0 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10096 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#28 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#32 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.008s ... 0.02s

#33 getting avg benchmarks for device 10096 +0s ... 0.021s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#36 got single benchmarks 10096 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#37 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#58 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#60 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#62 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#64 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.037s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.04s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.013s ... 0.053s

#76 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.057s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#78 return log +0.004s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)