HP OmniBook 7 Series

Graphics Adapter: AMD Radeon 860M, Intel Graphics 4-Core
Display: 13.30 inch, 14.00 inch
Weight: 0.99kg, 2.5kg
Average of 1 scores (from 4 reviews)
HP Omnibook 7 Aero 13-bg
Specifications

Processor: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Graphics Adapter: AMD Radeon 860M
Display: 13.30 inch, 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixels
Weight: 0.99kg
Links: HP homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tweakers

Positive: Compact size; light weight; good cooling system; comfortable keyboard; nice ergonomics. Negative: Without USB4 port; mediocre trackpad; short battery life; noisy under loads.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 06/11/2025
Source: VNReview

Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent 2K 120Hz display; smart AI Features; long battery life; quick charging; compact size; light weight. Negative: Non-expandable RAM.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/22/2025
Source: Zing

Positive: Slim size; light weight; premium design; great built quality; light weight; powerful processor; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/22/2025
HP OmniBook 7 AI 14-fr0000
Specifications

Processor: Intel Meteor Lake-U Ultra 5 225U
Graphics Adapter: Intel Graphics 4-Core
Display: 14.00 inch, 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixels
Weight: 2.5kg
Links: HP homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/04/2025
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Comment
HP: Founded in 1939, the US company is a major server and printer manufacturer and one of the leading IT companies in the world. Until 2015, the company was called Hewlett-Packard Company. After a split, the computer division was renamed HP Inc.
In 2023, HP had an approximate market share of 22% of global PC sales, making it number 2 after Lenovo.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
AMD Radeon 860M: A fairly powerful RDNA 3.5 architecture iGPU that debuted in early 2025 and a direct successor to the Radeon 760M. Its 8 CUs/WGPs (512 unified shaders) run at up to 3 GHz. DX12 Ultimate, ray tracing, AI image generation and other modern features are all supported here, as are many popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. Its gaming performance is good enough for playing 2024 games in low graphics settings.
Intel Graphics 4-Core: Integrated graphics card based on the Xe LPG architecture (similar to the dedicated Arc GPUs, but with a focus on efficiency). Provides 4 Xe cores (64 Xe vector engines) and 4 ray tracing units.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
AMD :
Ryzen AI 7 350: A relatively powerful Krackan Point family processor that was introduced in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4 Zen 5 cores with up to 5 GHz and 4 Zen 5c cores with up to 3.5 GHz).
Intel Meteor Lake-U:
Ultra 5 225U: High-end mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture. Offers 2 performance cores with up to 4.8 GHz (incl. SMT) and 8+2 efficiency cores with up to 3.8 GHz and can therefore process 14 threads simultaneously. Similar to the Core Ultra 5 135U, however, the Compute-Tile is manufactured in the new Intel 3 process and offers higher clocked CPU cores.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
14.00:
14 inch display size represents a middle ground between the small subnotebook formats and the screens of the standard 15 inch laptops.
The reason for the popularity of mid-sized displays is that this size is reasonably easy on the eyes, provides good resolutions with usable detail sizes, yet does not consume too much power and the devices can still be reasonably compact.
In the past, 14-inch devices were very rare, but now they are the standard for laptops after the 15-inchers.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
75%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.