ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:7900

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX

NVidia GeForce Go 7900 GTX is the predecessor of the 7950 GTX and has still a very good DirectX 9 performance. The card enalbes the user to play e.g. Doom3 in 1600x1200 fluently. The card was used in large notebooks (because of heat issues).

The chip also features the PureVideo Technology but has less features as the PureVideo engine in the current 8600M GT chip. > Comparison of PureVideo features

► remove from comparison

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove from comparison Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

show full text
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTXVivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Series
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI 48/16 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI 48/16 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 7950 GTX 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI 40/14 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GTX 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GS 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameG71M
ArchitectureG7x
Pipelines24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz600 / 800 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9_3, OpenGL 2.1 / ES 2.0
Power Consumption45 Watt
Transistors278 Million
technology90 nm
Features90nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 12.09.2013
Information90nm, 278 Mio Transistoren, MXM-Modul
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 997     avg: 1177     median: 1207.5 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 1912     avg: 2310     median: 2255 (0%)     max: 2694 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 25000     avg: 29490     median: 29490 (31%)     max: 33980 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 18200     avg: 18878     median: 18877.5 (10%)     max: 19555 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 7909     avg: 8436     median: 8504.5 (9%)     max: 8824 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
3DMark 06
min: 4700     avg: 4766     median: 4755.5 (6%)     max: 4852 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
3DMark 06
min: 4320     avg: 4503     median: 4503 (6%)     max: 4686 Points
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
1651 Points (57%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
4981 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5503 Points (57%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 13.87     avg: 18     median: 20.1 (33%)     max: 20.09 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 1.246     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (8%)     max: 2.262 fps
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 38.2     avg: 48.8     median: 49.5 (74%)     max: 58 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1549     avg: 1910     median: 1798 (2%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 682     avg: 707     median: 688 (1%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
80  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
10  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
108  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
67  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
27  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
51  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
38  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
27  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
57.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
38.7  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
29.6  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
51.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
17.2  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
175.5  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
59  fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
55  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
6  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
205  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
139.9  fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
135  fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
139.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
133.7  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7900 GTX:
326.8  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTXlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 14048010
F.E.A.R. 21086727
Left 4 Dead51
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare3827
Supreme Commander - FA Bench57.738.729.6
Crysis - GPU Benchmark51.517.2
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark175.5
F.E.A.R.59556
Counter-Strike Source205
Doom 3139.9135139.7133.7
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo326.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
2
1		1
3
1
1		4
1

4		1


1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 27. 02:01:04

#0 checking url part for id 4 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7900 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.157s ... 0.159s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.159s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.159s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4 +0.044s ... 0.203s

#9 got single benchmarks 4 +0.018s ... 0.221s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7900 +0.002s ... 0.223s

#11 got single benchmarks 7900 +0s ... 0.223s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0.002s ... 0.225s

#13 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.014s ... 0.239s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.239s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.145s ... 0.384s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.401s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.401s

#18 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.406s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.406s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.411s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.028s ... 0.439s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.439s

#23 return log +0.002s ... 0.442s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)