Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

The NVidia GeForce GTX 260M is a high-end graphics card of the 200M series based on the G92b core. Therefore, the 55nm chip is essentially a 9800M GTX with slightly higher clock rates (550/1375/950 vs. 500/1250/800). As a result, the 260M is more similar to the desktop 9800GT than the GTX 260.

As with all native DirectX 10 cards, the GeForce GTX 260M renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". Dedicated pixel shaders and vertex shaders have been replaced with 112 stream processors in the 260M, which now take over most of the graphics workload. The shader units themselves are also clocked higher (1375 MHz) than the core chip.

In general, the performance of the GTX 260M is somewhat higher than the 9800M GTX due to the higher clock speed. For current DirectX 10 games such as Crysis, World in Conflict, Bioshock or Age of Conan, the 260M is sufficient for gameplay under medium to high detail settings. Meanwhile, older games should be able to run fluently under high resolutions and full details. VRAM can be up to 1024 MB GDDR3 at 950MHz  in MXM 3.0 or 800MHz in MXM 2.0.

The GeForce GTX 260M integrates the PureVideo HD video decoder. The GPU is thus able to assist the CPU in the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 videos.

HybridPower is a Windows Vista-only technology that allows users to switch between the integrated and dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. In the future, Nvidia intends to evolve the software for automatic switching depending on the active application (now known as Optimus). GeForceBoost is not supported with the GTX 260M as there would be no performance gain from combining with the integrated GPU.

The high current consumption of up to 75 Watts (of the entire MXM board) means that the GTX 260M can typically only be found in larger notebooks with loud and powerful cooling systems.

Compared with Desktop graphics cards, the GTX 260M is most similar to the GeForce 9800 GT.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

The NVidia GeForce GTX 280M is a high-end graphics card as part of the 200M series and is based on the G92b core (Desktop GeForce 9800 GTX+). Therefore, it is actually more related to the GeForce 9800 GTX+, both performance-wise and architecturally, than to the GTX 280. The chip is produced in 55nm with all 128 pipelines enabled, as opposed to the GT 9800M with only 112 pipelines produced in a 65nm process.

Hybrid Power makes an appearance on the GTX 280M as well, but with much improved performance. Switch times on the graphics card now completes in just a fraction of a second, compared to a full 7 seconds on the 9800M GTX,

As with all DirectX 10 graphics cards, the GeForce GTX 280M renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". Dedicated pixel and vertex shaders of yesteryear are gone in favor of 128 stream processors running at 1250MHz on the GTX 280M.  The stream processors handle all of the workload that would have otherwise been processed by pixel or vertex shaders. VRAM can be up to 1024 MB GDDR3 clocked at either 800MHz (on MXM2 boards) or 950MHz (on MXM3 boards).

Due to the full 128 shader cores, the GTX 280M is about 10-25% faster than the older 9800M GTX and slightly faster than the 260M. Compared to the performance of the Mobility Radeon HD 4870, the GTX 280M is about equal in synthetic benchmarks, if not slightly lower. The Nvidia card, however, has proven to be slightly faster in games, so the GTX 280M can therefore be rated more highly in terms of real-life performance. Specifically, games with PhysX support (e.g., Mirrors Edge) can have significant performance advantages if PhysX effects are enabled. 

Another feature of the GeForce GTX 280M is the integrated PureVideo HD video processor. The card is able to assist the CPU in decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 video material.

HybridPower is a Windows Vista-only technique used to switch between the integrated (only with Nvidia chipset) and dedicated graphics cores for power-saving purposes. Eventually, Nvidia will have its future chips switch automatically between dedicated or integrated through drivers (now known as Optimus Technology). GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain from combining the integrated GPU with the discrete video card.

A high power consumption of up to 75 Watts (including the VRAM and MXM board) means that only large notebooks with powerful (and possibly loud) cooling systems can run the GTX 280M.

The newer GTX 285M is based on the same core as the GTX 280M, but with only slightly altered clock rates. As a result, the performance of the GeForce GTX285M is very similar to the GTX 280M.

Compared with Desktop graphic cards, the performance can be considered somewhere in between the 9800 GT and the 9800 GTX, the latter of which has considerably higher clock rates at 675/1675/1100MHz.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 200M Series
GeForce GTX 285M SLI compare 256 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M SLI compare 256 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M SLI compare 224 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M compare 128 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M 128 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M 112 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M SLI compare 256 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M SLI compare 256 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M SLI compare 224 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M compare 128 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M 128 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M 112 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
CodenameN10E-GTN10E-GTX
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Pipelines112 - unified128 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz585 MHz
Shader Speed1375 MHz1463 MHz
Memory Speed950 MHz950 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption75 Watt
Transistors754 Million754 Million
technology55 nm55 nm
FeaturesHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX readyHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX ready
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement02.03.2009 02.03.2009
InformationMXM 3MXM 3
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 4080     avg: 4953     median: 4901 (4%)     max: 5686 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
min: 5314     avg: 6328     median: 6672 (6%)     max: 6779 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3840     avg: 4316     median: 4207 (3%)     max: 5058 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
min: 5071     avg: 5243     median: 5257.5 (4%)     max: 5319 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32699     avg: 34053     median: 34304 (36%)     max: 34905 Points
min: 36607     avg: 38714     median: 38780 (40%)     max: 40754 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 27301     avg: 29794     median: 30595.5 (16%)     max: 30685 Points
min: 34632     avg: 35749     median: 35748.5 (19%)     max: 36865 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 12669     avg: 14773     median: 15079 (21%)     max: 16611 Points
min: 16800     avg: 18414     median: 18669 (26%)     max: 20713 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
10370 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
min: 9458     avg: 10167     median: 10064 (15%)     max: 11209 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
min: 11767     avg: 12569     median: 12551 (19%)     max: 13652 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
10075 Points (15%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.8 Points (86%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.8 Points (86%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.8 Points (85%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3702     avg: 3966     median: 3917 (17%)     max: 4425 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
min: 4111     avg: 5505     median: 5276.5 (22%)     max: 7845 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
28 fps (10%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M → 125% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
45  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
43.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
154  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
47  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
79.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
54.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
23.2  fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
137.4  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
59.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
55.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
40  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
51.3 80.3 ~ 66 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.3 50.5 ~ 46 fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
31.7 36.5 ~ 34 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
26.9  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
66.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
39.1  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
92  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
79.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
35.3  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
125.2 133 ~ 129 fps
78%
GeForce GTX 280M:
100  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
36.2 39 44 49.5 ~ 42 fps
114%
GeForce GTX 280M:
40 51.5 52.7 ~ 48 fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
313  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
105  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
89  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
132 151.2 ~ 142 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
86.5 89 91.1 ~ 89 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
63.8 65 67.4 73.4 77.4 ~ 69 fps
126%
GeForce GTX 280M:
82.5 86.1 91 ~ 87 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.8  fps
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
57.9  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 280M:
48 55.7 63.9 65.3 ~ 58 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
48  fps
110%
GeForce GTX 280M:
47 53.9 55.7 56.3 ~ 53 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
36.7  fps
103%
GeForce GTX 280M:
33 38.4 39.3 41.5 ~ 38 fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
107 135.8 ~ 121 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
69 85.8 103.3 111.7 ~ 92 fps
129%
GeForce GTX 280M:
104 121.2 131.5 ~ 119 fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
GeForce GTX 280M:
98  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GTX 280M:
62  fps
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 280M:
76  fps
ultra 1024x768
GeForce GTX 280M:
17  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
105 111.9 ~ 108 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61.5 72 75.1 ~ 70 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
52.7 53 56.2 59.1 ~ 55 fps
132%
GeForce GTX 280M:
72.8  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
211.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
95.2 168.8 ~ 132 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
52.8 67.3 77.8 88.5 ~ 72 fps
125%
GeForce GTX 280M:
75 78.8 117.5 ~ 90 fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
53.4  fps
103%
GeForce GTX 280M:
54.6 54.9 56 ~ 55 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
49.2  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 280M:
45 45.9 46.1 47.3 ~ 46 fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
92 123.7 ~ 108 fps
113%
GeForce GTX 280M:
106 115.4 128.6 138.9 ~ 122 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
56 57.2 76.9 ~ 63 fps
103%
GeForce GTX 280M:
60.9 65.9 66 67 ~ 65 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
31 38 38.4 39.3 41.9 ~ 38 fps
118%
GeForce GTX 280M:
43.1 44 45 45.1 48.6 ~ 45 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
12.2  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
110 129.5 ~ 120 fps
88%
GeForce GTX 280M:
95.2 102.1 117.1 ~ 105 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
49 52.6 76.9 ~ 60 fps
112%
GeForce GTX 280M:
61.2 66.2 72.4 ~ 67 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
30.7 35.5 37 37 39.2 ~ 36 fps
125%
GeForce GTX 280M:
41.2 43.8 47.3 49.5 ~ 45 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
11.5  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
47 72 ~ 60 fps
128%
GeForce GTX 280M:
77  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
38 42 ~ 40 fps
115%
GeForce GTX 280M:
46  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
22.7 26.6 27.2 ~ 26 fps
123%
GeForce GTX 280M:
29.3 33 33.1 ~ 32 fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
158  fps
91%
GeForce GTX 280M:
144  fps
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
62  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
51.8  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
121 270 ~ 196 fps
135%
GeForce GTX 280M:
265  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
GeForce GTX 280M:
161  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
178  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 280M:
160  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
575  fps
121%
GeForce GTX 280M:
695  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M → 112%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 110%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 03:24:24

#0 checking url part for id 1111 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1110 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.082s ... 0.082s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.085s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.085s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.085s

#12 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.085s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 1111 +0.029s ... 0.114s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#15 got single benchmarks 1111 +0.017s ... 0.131s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 1110 +0s ... 0.131s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.135s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.137s

#21 got single benchmarks 1110 +0.009s ... 0.146s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.146s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.147s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.147s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.147s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.149s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.153s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.153s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#113 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.155s

#114 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.155s

#115 Got 179 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.165s

#116 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.165s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#125 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.171s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.172s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.172s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.173s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.173s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.174s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.174s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.174s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.174s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.175s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.176s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.176s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.176s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.176s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.176s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.176s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.176s

#145 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.177s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.178s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#151 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.179s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.181s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#175 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.181s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.182s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#178 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.182s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#180 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.182s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#184 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.182s

#185 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.182s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#189 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.182s

#190 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.182s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.183s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.184s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.185s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.186s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.187s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.188s

#225 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.188s

#226 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.188s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.188s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.188s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.188s

#230 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.188s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.188s

#232 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.188s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.189s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#237 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.189s

#238 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.189s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#243 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.189s

#244 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.189s

#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#251 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.189s

#252 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.189s

#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#256 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.189s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.19s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#260 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.19s

#261 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.19s

#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#266 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.19s

#267 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.19s

#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#275 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.19s

#276 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.19s

#277 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.19s

#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.191s

#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.192s

#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.193s

#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.195s

#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.197s

#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.197s

#294 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.198s

#295 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.198s

#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.199s

#297 return log +0.002s ... 0.201s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)