Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple M1 vs Apple M2 Max

Samsung Exynos 2200

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 2200

The Samsung Exynos 2200  is a high end SoC with 8 cores in three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-S2 with up to 2.8 GHz for single thread performance. Three more slower ARM Cortex-A710 with up to 2.52 GHz for performance tasks and four efficient cores using the ARM Cortex-A510 architecture clocked at up to 1.82 GHz.

The SoC also integrates a 5G modem with up to 7.35 Gbps (5G NR Sub-6Hz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat.24 DL / Cat.22 UL) similar to the Exynos 2100. In addition to this, an image processor for 200mP in single camera mode and 8K video, an AI engine with a dual-core NPU and DPS and various GNSS systems (GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo).

As a first, the Exynos 2200 integrates a graphics card based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture called Samsung Xclipse 920).

The CPU performance in our benchmarks was slightly below the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (fastest Android SoC currently) and the Apple A15 in the iPhone 13.

The chip is produced in the modern 4nm process at Samsung using EUV.

Apple M1

► remove from comparison Apple M1

The Apple M1 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2020 MacBook Air, MacBook Pro 13, and Mac Mini. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 12 MB shared L2 cache. According to Apple the performance of these cores should be better than anything on the market (in late 2020). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3204 MHz.

The M1 is available in two TDP variants, a passive cooled 10 Watt variant for the MacBook Air and an active cooled faster variant for the MacBook Pro 13 and Mac Mini. Those should offer a better-sustained performance according to Apple.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 offers 8 cores (7 cores in the entry MacBook Air) and a peak performance of 2.6 teraflops. Apple claims that it is faster than any other iGPU at the time of announcement.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 11 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M1 includes 16 billion transistors (up from the 10 billion of the A12Z Bionic and therefore double the amount of a Tiger Lake-U chip like the i7-1185G7) and is manufactured in 5nm at TSMC.

Apple M2 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Max

The Apple M2 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 12 CPU cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 49 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (32, 64, or 96 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 Bit memory controller (400 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The CPU performance should be quite similar to the M2 Pro as only the higher memory bandwidth and bigger L3 cache could make a difference for some workloads.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Max offers a 30-core GPU or a GPU with all 38 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Max), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Max is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. The power consumption of the CPU part is up to 36 Watt according to powermetrics. When fully loading the CPU and GPU cores, the chip uses up to 89 Watt and the CPU part is limited to 25 Watt.

ModelSamsung Exynos 2200Apple M1Apple M2 Max
CodenameExynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510
SeriesSamsung ExynosApple M1Apple M2
Clock1820 - 2800 MHz2064 - 3220 MHz2424 - 3696 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 812 / 12
Technology4 nm5 nm5 nm
Features5G NR Sub-6GHz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat. 24/22, LPDDR5-RAM, Dual-Core NPU, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2ARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUSamsung Xclipse 920 ( - 555 MHz)Apple M1 8-Core GPUApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.com
Series: M2
Apple M1 Max2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M1 « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Apple M2 Max « 2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M22.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
L1 Cache2 MB3.3 MB
L2 Cache16 MB36 MB
L3 Cache8 MB48 MB
Transistors16000 Million67000 Million
Chip AI11 TOPS INT815.8 TOPS INT8
TDP79 Watt

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M1 +
110 Points (62%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M1 +
444 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M1 +
min: 7409     avg: 7728     median: 7800.5 (7%)     max: 7830 Points
189%
1 M2 Max +
min: 14738     avg: 14753     median: 14752.5 (14%)     max: 14767 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1496     avg: 1512     median: 1514.5 (64%)     max: 1520 Points
109%
1 M2 Max +
min: 1625     avg: 1644     median: 1643.5 (69%)     max: 1662 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 M1 +
min: 401     avg: 403     median: 402.5 (44%)     max: 406 Points
113%
1 M2 Max +
min: 451     avg: 455.5     median: 455.5 (50%)     max: 460 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1863     avg: 2040     median: 2093.5 (5%)     max: 2109 Points
194%
1 M2 Max +
min: 4044     avg: 4065     median: 4064.5 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1020     avg: 1063     median: 1072 (7%)     max: 1087 Points
194%
1 M2 Max +
min: 2074     avg: 2084     median: 2084 (13%)     max: 2094 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 M1 +
min: 206     avg: 207.3     median: 208 (58%)     max: 208 Points
113%
1 M2 Max +
min: 233     avg: 236     median: 236 (65%)     max: 239 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 M1 +
34614 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 M1 +
5441 MIPS (64%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M1 +
964 Seconds (12%)
296%
1 M2 Max +
326 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 M1 +
min: 412     avg: 561     median: 561 (4%)     max: 710 Seconds
168%
1 M2 Max +
333 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 M1 +
0.7 sec (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3909     avg: 4039     median: 3978.5 (37%)     max: 4288 Points
68%
1 M1 +
2711 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3923     avg: 4120     median: 4085.5 (47%)     max: 4385 Points
77%
1 M1 +
min: 1956     avg: 3137     median: 3136.5 (36%)     max: 4317 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1601 Points (39%)
148%
M1 +
2363 Points (57%)
2692 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
3938 Points (15%)
219%
M1 +
8622 Points (33%)
14863 Points (58%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 M1 +
2366 Points (75%)
119%
1 M2 Max +
2821 Points (90%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 M1 +
8635 Points (35%)
170%
1 M2 Max +
14677 Points (60%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1133     avg: 1148     median: 1149.5 (44%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 1965     avg: 1970     median: 1967 (75%)     max: 1978 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3474     avg: 3600     median: 3579.5 (6%)     max: 3768 Points
min: 15348     avg: 15388     median: 15373 (28%)     max: 15444 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5788     avg: 5830     median: 5829.5 (58%)     max: 5871 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15209     avg: 15260     median: 15259.5 (15%)     max: 15310 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 840.3     avg: 1306     median: 1408.5 (2%)     max: 1566 ms
min: 430.2     avg: 437.2     median: 437.2 (1%)     max: 444.2 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
281.5 ms (3%)
368%
1 M1 +
min: 65.2     avg: 75.9     median: 76.4 (1%)     max: 86.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 34055     avg: 42162     median: 41695 (31%)     max: 51202 Points
150%
M1 +
min: 62055     avg: 63340     median: 62589.5 (46%)     max: 66974 Points
min: 76610     avg: 77676     median: 77676 (57%)     max: 78742 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
130 Points (36%)
145%
M1 +
189 Points (52%)
min: 258     avg: 259     median: 259 (71%)     max: 260 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 124     avg: 142     median: 149 (27%)     max: 153 Points
min: 402     avg: 404.5     median: 404.5 (73%)     max: 407 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 M1 +
min: 104389     avg: 105297     median: 105297 (88%)     max: 106205 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 M1 +
min: 110874     avg: 111266     median: 111266 (90%)     max: 111658 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 M1 +
min: 533978     avg: 539206     median: 539206 (99%)     max: 544434 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 M1 +
min: 267169     avg: 271808     median: 271808 (98%)     max: 276446 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 M1 +
min: 1017190     avg: 1027580     median: 1027580 (99%)     max: 1037960 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 704479     avg: 797881     median: 818322 (40%)     max: 850401 Points
136%
1 M1 +
min: 1040910     avg: 1113810     median: 1113810 (54%)     max: 1186710 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 145904     avg: 195898     median: 208772 (52%)     max: 220142 Points
122%
1 M1 +
min: 244643     avg: 254253     median: 254252 (63%)     max: 263862 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
1124910 Points (36%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
327492 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
70.5 MB/s (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
685 MB/s (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
41.6 MB/s (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1300 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 31101     avg: 33630     median: 33934.5 (15%)     max: 35551 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 12579     avg: 13805     median: 13820.5 (50%)     max: 14998 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12233     avg: 12402     median: 12402 (81%)     max: 12571 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 888     avg: 979     median: 949.5 (36%)     max: 1129 Points
135%
M1 +
min: 1266     avg: 1301     median: 1283 (48%)     max: 1355 Points
min: 1759     avg: 1835     median: 1834.5 (69%)     max: 1910 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 +
27.2 Watt (5%)
37%
1 M2 Max +
72.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.24     avg: 6.7     median: 6.8 (3%)     max: 7.01 Watt
80%
1 M1 +
min: 8.23     avg: 8.7     median: 8.5 (4%)     max: 9.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 +
3 Watt (2%)
33%
1 M2 Max +
9.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.625     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.913 Watt
27%
1 M1 +
min: 2.29     avg: 2.9     median: 3.1 (4%)     max: 3.22 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 M1 +
37.5 Points per Watt (28%)
76%
1 M2 Max +
28.5 Points per Watt (21%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2200 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 → 182% n=9

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Max → 258% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 12. 16:22:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14146 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12937 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14975 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760278934s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 12 Oct 2025 11:12:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14146 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 14146 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12937 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 12937 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14975 +0s ... 0.015s

#13 got single benchmarks 14975 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.04s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)