Doogee Mix 2
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Average of 8 scores (from 12 reviews)
Reviews for the Doogee Mix 2
Source: Talk Android
It isn’t all negative for Doogee, because the smartphone maker shows ambition to improve with every new phone it releases. Perhaps a possible move to using Qualcomm processors in the company’s next flagship will result in the demise of the poor MediaTek skin, improved software optimization, and better use of the camera sensors.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/10/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews
The Doogee Mix 2 is a phone that delivers less than it appears to promise. It isn’t as “bezel-free” as it at first appears; its camera array is poorly designed; and the software could make much better use of the screen space.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Stuff TV
It doesn’t have the polish of its big-name rivals, but this mammoth phone lasts an age between charges.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
So is the Doogee Mix 2 a worthy successor to the Mix? Then the answer is yes. If you could look past its flaws, like its mediocre rear cameras quality and unresponsive fingerprint scanner, then this is one solid device. It’s got a large FHD+ display, 6GB RAM, 64GB internal storage, and 4060mAh battery. For its price, the Mix 2 is worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2018
For the seemingly insane price of $249, this is a seriously solid smartphone. Yeah, there are some drawbacks — the rear camera being the biggest — but that might be a small sacrifice if you just want a speedy, solid Android phone without breaking the bank. Doogee sells the Mix 2 right from its website (via Alibaba’s AliExpress) for its suggested price of $249, but you can nab it for as low as $199 during regular flash sales on several import sites, including BangGood and GearBest.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/19/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Newesc ES→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 75% performance: 72% display: 81% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN
Positive: Large screen; long battery life; decent hardware; good price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2018
Source: Pplware PT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
CommentARM Mali-T880 MP2: Mobile graphics solution for tablets and smartphones, which can be found in ARM SoCs (for mostly Android based devices). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP2 version features 2 clusters/cores.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
Helio P25: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2.6 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.6 LTE modem. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is typical for smartphones.
Doogee Mobile Limited Company produces smarpthones under the Doogee brand. Their products have first been reviewed from 2015 and only sporadically. The ratings are below-average (as of 2016).
73.75%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.