Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 8050

The MediaTek Dimensity 8050 is an ARM-based SoC (System-on-a-Chip) manufactured at TSMC using the 6nm process.  It supports all current mobile standards including dual-SIM 5G (5G SA & NSA, max 4.7 Gbps download and 2.5 Gbps upload). The SoC also supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2.

The MediaTek Dimensity 8050 was specially designed for use in Android smartphones and is classified in the upper mid-range in terms of performance.

The CPU part consists of three clusters: a fast performance core, based on the ARM Cortex A78 architecture and clocked at up to 3 GHz. The second cluster consists of three Cortex-A78 cores with up to 2.6 GHz. Four ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz are installed as a power-saving cluster.

The integrated ARM Mali-G77 MC9 graphics unit can drive displays with a resolution of up to 2,560 x 1,080 and a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz (possibly only with Full HD+).

Technically, the SoC is similar to the older Dimensity 1300.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 888 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in late 2020 and manufactured in 5 nm at Samsung. Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X1 architecture clocked at up to 2.84 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the A78 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 6e modem, a Hexagon 780 DSP (up to 26 TOPS of AI performance) and a Spectra 580 ISP. The integrated memory controller now supports faster LPDDR5 memory with up to 3,200 MHz. 5G is now included in the chip with the Snapdragon X60 modem.

The performance of the processor cores should be around 15% better than the old Snapdragon 865+. The integrated Adreon 660 GPU should make a bigger jump by 35% (most likely compared to the SD 865).

ModelMediaTek Dimensity 8050Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
CodenameCortex-A78 / A55Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Clock2000 - 3000 MHz1800 - 2840 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8 / 8
1 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X1
3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology6 nm5 nm
Features1x ARM Cortex-A77 (3 GHz), 3x ARM Cortex-A77 (2.6 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G77 MP9, APU 570, 5G Modem, MiraVision HDR10+, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, UFS 3.1, LPDDR4xAdreno 660 GPU, Spectra 580 ISP, Hexagon 780, X60 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi,LPDDR5-6400 / LPDDR4X-4266 MHz Memory Controller (64 Bit)
iGPUARM Mali-G77 MP9Qualcomm Adreno 660
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G « 1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
L3 Cache3 MB
TDP5 Watt
Chip AI26 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 888 5G
min: 1.289     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (99%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44810 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 958     avg: 1036     median: 1036 (25%)     max: 1114 Points
1480 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 2926     avg: 3173     median: 3173 (12%)     max: 3420 Points
3595 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 864     avg: 868     median: 867.5 (33%)     max: 871 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2779     avg: 2852     median: 2852 (5%)     max: 2925 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4348 Points (43%)
min: 5033     avg: 5081     median: 5087 (51%)     max: 5099 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11466 Points (11%)
min: 14023     avg: 14426     median: 14326 (14%)     max: 14895 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4421 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5565 Points (38%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
19860 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
9335 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11578 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1395.4     avg: 1713     median: 1713.3 (2%)     max: 2031.1 ms
min: 891     avg: 1319     median: 1321.5 (2%)     max: 1841 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29792     avg: 31904     median: 31904 (23%)     max: 34016 Points
min: 23491     avg: 35591     median: 35487.5 (26%)     max: 47543 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 71     avg: 76     median: 76 (21%)     max: 81 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
89 Points (16%)
min: 103     avg: 143.1     median: 148 (27%)     max: 182 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 73679     avg: 100640     median: 99442 (83%)     max: 119537 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 72541     avg: 99872     median: 101553 (82%)     max: 124036 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 226319     avg: 296422     median: 307949 (57%)     max: 319439 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 146069     avg: 180815     median: 186398 (67%)     max: 197454 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 569595     avg: 677749     median: 703138 (68%)     max: 740847 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 643695     avg: 685759     median: 685759 (33%)     max: 727823 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 161711     avg: 173949     median: 173948 (43%)     max: 186186 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
795719 Points (25%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
254404 Points (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 4722     avg: 6101     median: 6101 (1%)     max: 7480 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 62.3     avg: 76.5     median: 76.5 (52%)     max: 90.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 1180     avg: 1354     median: 1353.5 (38%)     max: 1527 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 42.8     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (22%)     max: 46.2 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 1484     avg: 1547     median: 1547 (38%)     max: 1610 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 37737     avg: 39361     median: 39360.5 (17%)     max: 40984 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11254     avg: 12862     median: 12862 (47%)     max: 14470 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 6823     avg: 9333     median: 9478.5 (50%)     max: 11551 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 10231     avg: 12376     median: 12822.5 (84%)     max: 15027 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 11823     avg: 14555     median: 14328 (72%)     max: 18942 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 738     avg: 741     median: 741 (28%)     max: 744 Points

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 8050 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G → 122% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 09. 14:41:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15089 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13017 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760013719s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15089 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 15089 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13017 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 13017 +0.019s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.053s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.056s

#14 return log +0s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)