Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron B800 vs Intel Celeron 887

Intel Celeron B800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B800 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B800 should be similar fast as a 2 GHz Core 2 Duo processor.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

Intel Celeron 887

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron B800Intel Celeron 887
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1500 MHz1500 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPGA988BGA1023
FeaturesIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$80 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron B800Intel Celeron 887
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
0.6 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
B800 +
1910 Points (17%)
98%
887 +
1877 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
B800 +
3779 Points (5%)
95%
887 +
3597 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
4497 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
2362 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
B800 +
1508 s (18%)
98%
887 +
1626 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
B800 +
47 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 887 +
986 Points (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 887 +
0 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
B800 +
1534 Points (3%)
92%
887 +
1414 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
B800 +
26.1 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 887 +
64 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 887 +
1343 s (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
B800 +
5.1 Points (65%)
100%
887 +
5.1 Points (65%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 887 +
3383 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B800 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → 98% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 21:03:34

#0 checking url part for id 2726 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3348 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 2726 +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 got single benchmarks 2726 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 3348 +0s ... 0.015s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#30 got single benchmarks 3348 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#56 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.029s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#58 return log +0.004s ... 0.033s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)