Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (84° wide-angle, 24mm, f/2.0)
Pricecompare
Average of 36 scores (from 56 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Ambitious. With the fourth generation of the ZenFone series, Asus challenges a fiercely contested submarket by not only offering competitive pricing but also by providing their latest offering with a strong camera. Moreover, ZenUI has taken a great leap forward, making it seem positively grown up!
Source: Mobile Syrup Archive.org version
The ZenFone 4 marks yet another quality addition to Asus’s ZenFone line. While its lack of carrier support may mean it’s destined to remain an obscure brand for most consumers, those seeking quality inexpensive options online would do well to consider this handset.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hexus Archive.org version
The Asus ZenFone 4 is something of a Marmite smartphone. Slim, relatively light and possessing an above-average main camera, punchy audio, solid battery life and decent build quality, Asus gets a number of important factors right for this upper-midrange handset. However, the list of potential gripes is equally as long, with the ZenFone 4 outfitted with a slippy back, average screen, and, for the price, only a Snapdragon 630 chipset.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2018
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
Overall, I really top handset. I’m only sorry that it’s not available on the big networks here in the UK, so you’ll need to go through Amazon or Tesco for £449.99 or perhaps on a plan via Carphone Warehouse. It is a fantastic handset and priced well considering the quality and speed of it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 91% workmanship: 91%
Source: Kitguru Archive.org version
All in all, it is definitely a good phone for £450. It doesn’t really do anything special, but if you want a solid mid-range phone that doesn’t have any serious weaknesses, the ASUS ZenFone 4 will likely appeal.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena Archive.org version
All in all, The Zenfone 4 and Zenfone 4 Pro are both improvements over previous Zenfones. The ZenFone 4, in particular, is a solid option in its price point, so we’re pretty confident in saying that there’s never been a better time to try out a Zenfone – especially if it’s the Zenfone 4.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central Archive.org version
And that's where I feel it comes to a sad conclusion. The ZenFone 4 is an excellent phone, but it's one that many may pass over because of its price. If the ASUS thing takes your fancy, the entry-level ZenFone 4 Max with an enormous battery is £200 less. But at £449, you're paying a fairly high price for a mid-range device. Ultimately, that's where it comes unstuck.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2017
Source: Tech Nave Archive.org version
Overall, the ZenFone 4 is still a pretty good phone. My favourite features have to be the beautifully compact design, excellent battery performance and the camera is quite good too and it handles games quite well. The 8MP wide-angle is still okay in certain situations, but seriously, they really need to fix the connectivity performance. You may also find that your ZenFone 4 lags at times, so always be sure to check if there are any software updates because during my three weeks review, I've updated it three times already and I'm sure they will continue to roll out more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Source: Unbox Archive.org version
Here’s the thing — the ASUS Zenfone 4 is underrated. People don’t get to see how good it really is because they’re immediately turned off by the price. Other flagship devices are just a few thousand pesos more so it’s hard to not consider other options. The hard reality is that the ZenFone 4 faces a tough competition at its current price point.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2017
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
Probably doesn't signal the start of an Asus assault on our phone-buying habits, but the ZenFone 4 is perfectly potent - if a little too stuck in its ways when it comes to software.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
All-in-all, the Zenfone 4 (SD630) is pretty much similar to its more powerful twin – same attractive and premium build, Super IPS display, and good camera quality. The only difference is the slight decrease in performance. Still, this device is capable of handling multiple tasks and a worthy addition to the Zenfone 4 lineup.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2017
Foreign Reviews
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 83% workmanship: 85%
Source: Game IT ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; decent cameras; nice speakers; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/29/2018
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/27/2017
Source: Geeknetic ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: No bloatware; great built quality; nice display; decent cameras. Negative: High price; weak processor; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: Noticias 3D ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice performance; beautiful design; good cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/23/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% features: 82% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Ridble IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Key for web IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 80% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Geek 4 You IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 72% features: 88% display: 84% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 76%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 60% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Poor display; weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/28/2017
Source: Notebook Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; fast system; large battery capacity; fast fingerprint sensor; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; high performance; metal case. Negative: Mediocre design; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good cameras; nice performance; great built quality; decent display. Negative: Mediocre design; poor Wifi connection; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2017
Source: XGN NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good cameras. Negative: Short battery life; mediocre speakers; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2017
Source: Hitek FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; nice display; long battery life; fast charging. Negative: Low performance; high DAS.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/17/2017
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Lovely design; good dual cameras; nice display; decent speakers. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Teknokulis TR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 78% display: 92% mobility: 64%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 59% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 60%
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice cameras; rich set of ports. Negative: High price; sim and microSD are on the same slot.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2017
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2017
Source: Dinside NO→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; great built quality; good price. Negative: Average performance; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/28/2017
Source: Alt om Data DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Input DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Computerblog.ro →EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; nice main camera; high autonomy; good display. Negative: Weak processor; high price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 508: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 630 SoC based on the Adreno 500 architecture. According to Qualcomm "up to 30% faster graphics rendering than previous designs".
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 630: Mid-range octa-core SoC with eight ARM Cortex-A53 cpu cores at up to 2.2 GHz, an Adreno 508 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller and a X12 LTE (Cat 13/12, 300 / 150 MBit) modem. Manufactured in the modern 14nm process. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. is a major Taiwanese computer hardware manufacturer based in Taipei, founded in 1989. Under the Asus brand name, the company manufactures a wide range of products, including laptops, desktops, motherboards, graphics cards, monitors, smartphones and networking equipment, complete systems and PC components for end users.
Under the ROG (Republic of Gamers) brand name, ASUS manufactures gaming laptops known by gamers for their powerful specifications, dedicated graphics cards, high refresh rate displays and advanced cooling systems.
Beyond gaming, a wide range of notebooks are offered for different needs and budgets, from ultra-slim and lightweight ultrabooks to versatile 2-in-1 convertibles and budget-friendly options. In 2023, Asus had a 7% global market share of the PC market.
Customer satisfaction with ASUS notebooks concerns performance, the features, and the good price-performance ratio of ASUS notebooks. However, as with any brand, there are occasional reports of problems such as overheating, driver compatibility, or build quality issues.
77.74%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.