Asus VivoBook S200E-CT182H
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus VivoBook S200E-CT182H
No fear of contact. There is a plethora of inexpensive subnotebooks on the market - but the new Asus VivoBook S200E is different: high build quality and a multi-touch-enabled display set it apart and are supposed to appeal to potential buyers. Are those attributes alone enough for us to recommend the system?
Source: Notebook Italia

Positive: Touch screen; compact; lightweight; decent autonomy; ratio of performance and power consumption; good sound system; price. Negative: Strong reflection of the srceen.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/25/2012
Source: Techno Zoom

Positive: Touchscreen; configure options; Asus SonicMaster technology; the weight.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 10/28/2012
Source: Notebook.cz

Positive: Good mechanical processing; full terminal equipment. Negative: Long-term exercise reduces processor power; slow charge.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/11/2014
Source: Dinside

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2012
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: HwT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2013
Rating: price: 80% performance: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Itsvet

Positive: Very attractive design; very compact dimensions; excellent touch screen; pretty good performance and autonomy ratio.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2013
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 4000: Processor graphics card in the high end Ivy Bridge models. Offers a different clock speed in the different CPU models (ULV to desktop quad core) and therefore a different performance.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
3217U: Ivy-Bridge-based ULV-CPU in Q2 2012. Offers a core clock of 1.8 GHz (no Turbo Boost) and an HD 4000 GPU (350 - 1050 MHz). The TDP is rated at 17 W.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.