Asus UL80VT-WX007X
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 3 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus UL80VT-WX007X
Source: Digital Versus
Archive.org versionThe attractively-designed UL80Vt from Asus is pitched as a model with high performance and good battery life. Yet it doesn’t sacrifice compactness – girth and weight have been kept under control. The Asus UL80Vt is designed with looks, battery life, and performance in mind, and it manages to attain most of its objectives. What we dislike most is the glossy, poor-quality LCD panel and other glossy magnet-for-fingerprints surfaces.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2009
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AnandTech
Archive.org versionAt this point, you should probably already have a good idea of whether the ASUS UL80Vt is going to be the sort of laptop you want to purchase. Provided that raw computational or graphics performance are not your primary concern, the UL80Vt is one of the best laptops we've looked at in a long time. If you've ever considered buying a netbook simply because they're small and get good battery life, the UL80Vt is like a netbook on steroids. It will easily provide twice the performance of your typical Intel Atom-based netbook, and it can do that while still going toe to toe in terms of battery life. The only catch is that it weighs slightly more… and it costs about twice as much as most netbooks.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2009
Rating: price: 50% performance: 80% mobility: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/14/2009
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 83% display: 78% mobility: 92% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 86% emissions: 87%
Source: Sohoa VN Express
VN→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 85%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce G210M: The GeForce G210M is the successor of the G110M and also possesses 16 shader cores. Because of the 40nm process, the chip is clocked much higher but is still staying in the same power envelope.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
SU7300: Slow clocked dual core processor with a low TDP of 10 Watt.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
