Asus MeMo Pad 10-ME102A
Specifications
Asus MeMo Pad 10-ME102A (Memo Pad Series)
Processor
Rockchip RK3188 4c/4t 4 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A9
Graphics adapter
unknown
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
520 g ( = 18.34 oz / 1.15 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
200 Euro
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
price: 67%, performance: 64%, features: 65%, display: 76% mobility: 77%, workmanship: 50%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Asus MeMo Pad 10-ME102A
Asus Memo Pad 10 review
Source: PC Pro
Archive.org version
While the Asus Memo Pad HD10’s performance puts it just ahead of its rivals, it doesn’t do quite enough to distinguish itself. For this kind of money, we’d plump for a higher-quality 7in tablet, such as Google's Nexus 7, which offers significantly higher quality than the MeMO Pad for only £20 more. Even if you’re dead set on a budget 10in tablet, then we’d still recommend you buy the £200 Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 instead, which offers similar performance, a brighter screen, better build quality and a nifty Bluetooth keyboard.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2014
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 67% performance: 50% features: 50% workmanship: 50%
Source: PC Pro
Archive.org versionWhile the Asus Memo Pad HD10’s performance puts it just ahead of its rivals, it doesn’t do quite enough to distinguish itself. For this kind of money, we’d plump for a higher-quality 7in tablet, such as Google's Nexus 7, which offers significantly higher quality than the MeMO Pad for only £20 more. Even if you’re dead set on a budget 10in tablet, then we’d still recommend you buy the £200 Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 instead, which offers similar performance, a brighter screen, better build quality and a nifty Bluetooth keyboard.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2014
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 67% performance: 50% features: 50% workmanship: 50%
Foreign Reviews
Asus Memopad 10
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2014
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 77% features: 80% display: 76% mobility: 77%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2014
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 77% features: 80% display: 76% mobility: 77%
Comment
unknown:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
RK3188:
Quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 processor manufactured in 28nm and clocked at 1.8 GHz. Integrates a Mali-400 MP4 GPU and a (LP-)DDR2/DDR3 memory controller.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Add as a preferred source on Google
