Asus A6T
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 7 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus A6T
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2007
Rating: Total score: 65% performance: 71% features: 73% display: 77% mobility: 35% ergonomy: 75%
Source: TV Movie Multimedia
DE→EN Archive.org versionUser Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/16/2006
Rating: Total score: 95% price: 95%
Source: Guenstiger.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionUser Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/24/2006
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Preissuchmaschine
DE→EN Archive.org versionUser Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/24/2006
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 85%
Source: Ciao.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionUser Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/23/2006
Rating: Total score: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2006
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 95%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/27/2006
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% performance: 81% features: 76% ergonomy: 85%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600: The NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 is a middle class video card of the 7000 series and suited for games of the year 2006. The performance is very similar to ATI X1600 / X1700. Compared to the desktop 7600 it is clearly slower.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
AMD Turion 64 X2: AMD Turion 64 X2 is intended to be positioned against the Intel Core Duo was presented in 17. May 2006. The current consumption is not higher than with Centrino-Duo-notebooks (TL-45 with ATI Xpress and Mobility Radeon X300). This means, that approximative the same battery runtime and fan functions can be expected (with this chipset). However, the performance was 20% below the T2300 (1.66 GHz) due to the lower L2 Cache (Core Duo has 2048 Kbyte shared L2 Cache). Nevertheless, the performance is sufficient.
TL-52:
In 90nm produced dual core processor with a low clock rate of 1.6 GHz. The TL-52 is still based on the K8 core and compareable to a slower clocked Core Duo.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
