Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 722 vs Qualcomm Adreno 730

Qualcomm Adreno 722

► remove from comparison

The Adreno 722 is a relatively high-performance iGPU for Android tablets, phones and handhelds that debuted alongside the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SoC and features an unknown, as of August 2025, number of unified shaders.

Qualcomm Adreno 730

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 730

The Qualcomm Adreno 730 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2022 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 730 GPU offers a 30% improved performance thanks to 30% more ALUs over the Adreno 660, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 888 SoC.  Thanks to the new 4nm process, the power efficiency should also be improved.

The Adreno 730 supports Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. 

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 722Qualcomm Adreno 730
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL 3.2 ES, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
Date of Announcement15.05.2025 30.11.2021
PredecessorAdreno 720
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Adreno 722GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 730GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
766 Points (2%)
min: 858     avg: 865     median: 865 (2%)     max: 872 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7662 Points (4%)
min: 6483     avg: 10277     median: 10412 (5%)     max: 11201 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
2042 Points (2%)
min: 1567     avg: 2544     median: 2568 (3%)     max: 2899 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1067     avg: 11770     median: 11974 (52%)     max: 15306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 15268     avg: 24195     median: 25285 (56%)     max: 27751 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5983     avg: 10777     median: 10726 (45%)     max: 13386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11082     avg: 17826     median: 18581 (46%)     max: 20955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
15 fps (6%)
min: 13     avg: 19.8     median: 20 (7%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
33 fps (6%)
min: 19     avg: 41.2     median: 42 (8%)     max: 52 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
86 fps (6%)
min: 60     avg: 104.3     median: 102 (8%)     max: 138 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
73 fps (7%)
min: 50     avg: 85.5     median: 84 (8%)     max: 108 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
124 fps (3%)
min: 95     avg: 144.2     median: 143 (3%)     max: 189 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
171 fps (7%)
min: 126     avg: 210.3     median: 211 (9%)     max: 282 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 722
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
272 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 730
min: 245     avg: 388.8     median: 389.5 (3%)     max: 468 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 293017     avg: 423114     median: 430076 (43%)     max: 479126 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
362081 Points (25%)
min: 428974     avg: 468332     median: 486753 (34%)     max: 489270 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
105.1 fps (3%)
min: 128.28     avg: 144.8     median: 144.8 (4%)     max: 161.33 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 5301     avg: 5752     median: 5535 (1%)     max: 6421 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 6354     avg: 7072     median: 6805.5 (2%)     max: 8322 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
26983 Points (9%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
37313 Points (49%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
8.7 Watt (3%)
min: 5.52     avg: 9.3     median: 9.4 (4%)     max: 14.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 722 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 127% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 722:
56.9  fps
105%
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 722:
56.9  fps
105%
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 730:
110  fps
high
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 722:
87.6  fps
83%
Adreno 730:
55 91 ~ 73 fps
high
Adreno 730:
55  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 722:
58  fps
100%
Adreno 730:
55 60 ~ 58 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 730:
35 59.3 59.6 ~ 51 fps
med.
Adreno 730:
35 60 ~ 48 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
30 34 41.7 59.4 60 ~ 45 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 730:
30 43 56.9 60 60 60 60 60 60 63 72 90 94 99 103 188 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 722:
57.6  fps
106%
Adreno 730:
57 57 58 58 58.8 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 89.2 ~ 61 fps
med.
Adreno 730:
51 58 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 59 fps
high
100%
Adreno 722:
57.6  fps
99%
Adreno 730:
30 30 50 55 58 58 58.9 59 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
30 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 730:
30 60 ~ 45 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 722 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%

Qualcomm Adreno 722Qualcomm Adreno 730
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal56.956.96060
Call of Duty Mobile87.658735558
PUBG Mobile57.657.661595740
Qualcomm Adreno 722Qualcomm Adreno 730
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1




1


2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3

1


2


2
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 09. 02:09:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13181 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11105 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767920974s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:03:58 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13181 +0.017s ... 0.043s

#9 got single benchmarks 13181 +0.005s ... 0.047s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11105 +0s ... 0.048s

#11 got single benchmarks 11105 +0.034s ... 0.082s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.087s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.089s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.089s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.101s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.101s

#20 Got 151 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.121s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.121s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.121s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.125s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.125s

#25 return log +0.001s ... 0.126s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)