Acer Chromebook 15 CB3-532-C47C
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Chromebook 15 CB3-532-C47C
Source: Computer Shopper
 Archive.org versionIs the Acer Chromebook perfect? To put it flatly, no. If we were sourcing the parts, we would have specified a better, slightly higher-res screen, a Core i3 CPU with 4GB of RAM, 32GB of onboard storage, and much better speakers and sound engineering. Of course, then it would be a $400 or $500 Chromebook. For $199, we’re happy to live with its shortcomings in order to be able to afford one (or even two) extra Internet devices around the house.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Mag
 Archive.org versionIf you're looking for a bargain on a chromebook, and you value function over form, it's really hard to do better than the Chromebook 15. You might be giving up style, but in return you'll get a bigger screen and absurdly long battery life—while only paying $200. If design does matter to you or you'd like clearer visuals, however, you could shell out a little more for our Editors' Choice pick, the Acer Chromebook 14.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tom's Hardware
 DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2016
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell): Integrated graphics card in the Intel Braswell series (2016 Celeron) processors. Based on the Broadwell architecture (Intel Gen8) supporting DirectX 11.2. Depending on the processor offers 12 shader cores (EU) and different clock speeds.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
N3060: SoC with an integrated dual core Atom processor clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz, an Intel HD Graphics GPU and a dual channel DDR3L-1600 memory controller.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
