Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 vs Intel Celeron 807 vs Intel Celeron B800

AMD Ryzen 7 H 260

► remove from comparison AMD AMD R7 H 260

The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is a high-end notebook processor from the Hawk Point series with 8 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 16 threads simultaneously. At release, the CPU is only available in China and is technically practically identical to the older AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS or Ryzen 7 7840HS (slower AI engine).

The performance of the second-fastest model in the Hawk Point series should only be slightly behind the Ryzen 9 7940HS (+100 - 200 MHz clock, e.g. only 2% slower Turbo). As a result, the performance at 54W TDP should also be comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W, 32 MB L3) and thus clearly ahead of the old top model AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX resp. 6980HS (with lower TDP).

The chip integrates a modern RDNA 3-based graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7GHz including AV1 video engine. Furthermore, a Xilinx FPGA-based XDNA AI accelerator is also integrated, which is now clocked higher. Hawk Point offers 2x USB 4 (40 Gbps), 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support).

The Hawk Point series is a single chip (unlike the Dragon Range 7045HX series) and is manufactured at TSMC using the modern 4nm FinFET process.

Intel Celeron 807

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 807 is a ULV single core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 350-950 MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to other Celerons, the 807 should be faster than a Celeron B720, thanks to Hyper-Threading support.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 807 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron B800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B800 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B800 should be similar fast as a 2 GHz Core 2 Duo processor.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 H 260Intel Celeron 807Intel Celeron B800
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 807 « 1.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B800 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1500 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB64 KB
L2 Cache8 MB256 KB512 KB
L3 Cache16 MB1.5 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
1 / 22 / 2
TDP45 Watt17 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1023PGA988
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$70 U.S.$80 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 B800 +
1910 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 B800 +
3779 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 B800 +
1508 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 B800 +
47 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 B800 +
1534 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 B800 +
26.1 s (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 B800 +
5.1 Points (65%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B800 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 24. 15:05:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19849 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3364 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 2726 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756040732s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 19849 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 19849 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3364 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#11 got single benchmarks 3364 +0s ... 0.009s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2726 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#13 got single benchmarks 2726 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.017s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.017s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)