Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9420e vs Intel Celeron N3450

AMD A9-9420e

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420e

The AMD A9-9420e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation). It was first found in the Dell Inspiron 3000 with passive cooling and 4 GB DDR4 RAM. The performance in that device was way below the normal A9-9420 as the clock speed only reached up to 2,5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 between 10-25 Watts, but the passively cooled A9-9420e should be positioned lower than 9 Watt.

Intel Celeron N3450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.2 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.1 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.2 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 15-20 percent faster than the old N3710 (Braswell) and compete with an AMD A4-7210. This means the processor is perfectly suited for daily tasks (office, browsing) as well as moderate multi-tasking.

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles like Counter-Strike: GO or Diablo 3 will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelAMD A9-9420eIntel Celeron N3450
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron
CodenameStoney RidgeApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e « - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 « 1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock <=2500? MHz1100 - 2200 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketBGAFCBGA1296
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,Intel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
TDP6 Watt
$107 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 143 (1%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 44     median: 44.5 (13%)     max: 48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.63     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.59 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1219     avg: 1362     median: 1415 (9%)     max: 1451 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3956     avg: 4318     median: 3959 (3%)     max: 5039 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 21.14     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 23.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1020 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.2 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.147 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.2 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2576 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.45     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 34.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 67.6     median: 67.6 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1780     avg: 1980     median: 1925 (5%)     max: 2291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
14788 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
14287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15289     avg: 16256     median: 16256 (14%)     max: 17223 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1364     avg: 1433     median: 1433 (4%)     max: 1502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1952     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (4%)     max: 2105 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1399 Points (14%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4001 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1385     avg: 1422     median: 1422 (19%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3821     avg: 3953     median: 3953 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3958 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1202 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3476 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
258.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
11297 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420e → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3450 → 147% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 15:40:41

#0 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8184 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.006s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8184 +0.003s ... 0.043s

#9 got single benchmarks 8184 +0.024s ... 0.067s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.123s ... 0.19s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.216s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)