Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-9225 vs Intel Celeron N3450

AMD A6-9225

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9225

The AMD A6-9225 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2018. Compared to the one year older A4-9220, the A4-9225 has a 200 MHz higher CPU Boost clock but a slower iGPU. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and one FP unit) clocked at 2.6 GHz to 3.1 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at up to 686 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video decoder and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor to the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The average 9225 in our database proves to be a very, very, very slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core 2 Duo P8600 (a dual-core CPU that saw the light of day in 2008). This is a record-breakingly poor performance and a warning to anyone looking to purchase a system built around this specific A6 series CPU.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 686 MHz instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above.

Power consumption

This AMD A6 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W. Laptop makers are allowed to reduce that value somewhat, 10 W being the lower limit, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the APU.

Last but not the least, the A6-9225 is built with a 28 nm process leading to very, very low energy efficiency, as of 2022.

Intel Celeron N3450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.2 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.1 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.2 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 15-20 percent faster than the old N3710 (Braswell) and compete with an AMD A4-7210. This means the processor is perfectly suited for daily tasks (office, browsing) as well as moderate multi-tasking.

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles like Counter-Strike: GO or Diablo 3 will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelAMD A6-9225Intel Celeron N3450
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron
CodenameStoney RidgeApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 « 2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 « 1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2600 - 3100 MHz1100 - 2200 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
FeaturesDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 686 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
SocketFCBGA1296
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 A6-9225 +
182 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 A6-9225 +
273 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 96     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (1%)     max: 121 Points
min: 128     avg: 146.8     median: 143 (1%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
73 Points (22%)
min: 36     avg: 44     median: 44.5 (13%)     max: 48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.03     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.44 Points
min: 1.63     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.59 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2532 Points (15%)
min: 1219     avg: 1362     median: 1415 (9%)     max: 1451 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4193 Points (3%)
min: 3956     avg: 4318     median: 3959 (3%)     max: 5039 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
852 s (10%)
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
26.3 s (5%)
min: 21.14     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 23.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
852 Points (1%)
1020 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.1 fps (3%)
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
48.9 fps (11%)
58.2 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.147 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
1.2 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2132 Points (5%)
2576 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.2 s (4%)
min: 27.45     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 34.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.5 s (2%)
min: 61.2     avg: 67.6     median: 67.6 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
968 s (4%)
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1568 Points (4%)
min: 1780     avg: 1980     median: 1925 (5%)     max: 2291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
16446 Points (13%)
14788 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
15678 Points (13%)
14287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
16322 Points (14%)
min: 15289     avg: 16256     median: 16256 (14%)     max: 17223 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1304 Points (3%)
min: 1364     avg: 1433     median: 1433 (4%)     max: 1502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1821 Points (3%)
min: 1952     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (4%)     max: 2105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 A6-9225 +
664 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1980 Points (20%)
1399 Points (14%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3190 Points (4%)
4001 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1920 Points (26%)
min: 1385     avg: 1422     median: 1422 (19%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3035 Points (7%)
min: 3821     avg: 3953     median: 3953 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3103 Points (6%)
3958 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1855 Points (36%)
1202 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3323 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1974 Points (30%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3899 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 A6-9225 +
2849 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 A6-9225 +
4490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 A6-9225 +
4014 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3936 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2657 ms (3%)
3476 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.6 ms (2%)
258.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
11962 Points (11%)
11297 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
81 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9225 → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3450 → 103% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 19:11:44

#0 checking url part for id 11281 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8184 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11281 +0.002s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 11281 +0.009s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8184 +0.002s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 8184 +0.021s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.207s ... 0.271s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.293s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)