Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-9220e vs Intel Celeron J3455

AMD A6-9220e

AMD A6-9220e

The AMD A6-9220e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2017. The 9220e is an entry-level Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.6 - 2.4 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the similar named A6-9220 the 9220e is significantly slower clocked (2.5 - 2.9 GHz) including the GPU (600 versus 655 MHz) and can be passively cooled thanks to the TDP of 6W.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220e is noticeably slower than the A6-9220. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark the 9220 reaches 38% higher scores, in the single thread test its more than twice as fast (219% versus the 9220 in the HP 255 G6). Compared to Intel CPUs, the A6-9220e is on par with the old Celeron N2820 in Cinebench (single and multi core). Therefore, the CPU is placed in the lowest segment (performance wise) and only suited for light tasks and light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220e with 6 Watts and therefore significantly below the 15 W of the A6-9220. This means the APU can be passively cooled and is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Celeron J3455

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J3455

The Intel Celeron J3355 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and Mini-PCs and was announced in late 2016. It runs at 1.5 - 2.3 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron J3455 is between the mobile Celeron N3450 and Pentium N4200 in the lower range of mobile processors. Therefore, the CPU is best suited for light tasks with not much multitasking (office, browsing).

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The Celeron J3455 is specified at 10 Watt TDP and therefore 4 Watts higher than the slightly faster Pentium N4200.

ModelAMD A6-9220eIntel Celeron J3455
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron
CodenameStoney RidgeApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J3455 « 1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1600 - 2400 MHz1500 - 2300 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP6 Watt10 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketBGAFCBGA1296
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Intel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
$107 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
73 Points (8%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
110 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
86 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
31 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1056 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1741 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1517 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
519 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
2.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
14.7 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.3 GB/s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
66.4 s (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
113.1 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2732 s (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
529 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
4502 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
4404 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
5273 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
444 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
376 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
293 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1024 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
260 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
293 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1260 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1571 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1112 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1513 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1929 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1247 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2003 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1329 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3297 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2796 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3496 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3085 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3192 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4105 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
357.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
9070 Points (8%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
64 Points (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220e → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J3455 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 16:06:01

#0 checking url part for id 11876 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13183 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11876 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#7 got single benchmarks 11876 +0.008s ... 0.052s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13183 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 13183 +0.006s ... 0.062s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.169s ... 0.231s

#12 return log +0.052s ... 0.282s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)