Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-9220e vs AMD A9-9420e vs AMD A6-9220C

AMD A6-9220e

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220e

The AMD A6-9220e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2017. The 9220e is an entry-level Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.6 - 2.4 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the similar named A6-9220 the 9220e is significantly slower clocked (2.5 - 2.9 GHz) including the GPU (600 versus 655 MHz) and can be passively cooled thanks to the TDP of 6W.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220e is noticeably slower than the A6-9220. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark the 9220 reaches 38% higher scores, in the single thread test its more than twice as fast (219% versus the 9220 in the HP 255 G6). Compared to Intel CPUs, the A6-9220e is on par with the old Celeron N2820 in Cinebench (single and multi core). Therefore, the CPU is placed in the lowest segment (performance wise) and only suited for light tasks and light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220e with 6 Watts and therefore significantly below the 15 W of the A6-9220. This means the APU can be passively cooled and is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

AMD A9-9420e

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420e

The AMD A9-9420e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation). It was first found in the Dell Inspiron 3000 with passive cooling and 4 GB DDR4 RAM. The performance in that device was way below the normal A9-9420 as the clock speed only reached up to 2,5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 between 10-25 Watts, but the passively cooled A9-9420e should be positioned lower than 9 Watt.

AMD A6-9220C

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220C

The AMD A6-9220C is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for Chromebooks (7th APU generation from 2016), which was announced early 2019. Compared to the A6-9220, the 9220C is rated at a reduced TDP of 6 versus 15 Watt and also reduced clock speeds. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8 - 2.7 GHz (versus 2.5 - 2.9 GHz on the A6-9220).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220C should be noticeably slower than the old A6-9220. AMD compares the performance against the Pentium N4200 in ChromeOS and sees the A6-9220C clearly ahead. The efficiency should be worse however, due to the old manufacturing process.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is a bit controversal, as AMD states 3 compute cores which should translate to 192 shaders.

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220C with 6 Watts which should enable thin and light (even fanless) Chromebooks.

ModelAMD A6-9220eAMD A9-9420eAMD A6-9220C
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameStoney RidgeStoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 - 2400 MHz <=2500? MHz1800 - 2700 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB160 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Transistors1200 Million1200 Million1200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketBGABGABGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
73 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
110 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
86 Points (1%)
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
97 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
31 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1056 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
1741 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1517 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
519 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
2.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
14.7 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.3 GB/s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
66.4 s (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
113.1 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2732 s (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
529 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
4502 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
4404 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
5273 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
444 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
376 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
260 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
293 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1260 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1571 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1112 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1513 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1929 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1247 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2003 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1329 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3297 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2796 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3496 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3085 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3192 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4105 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
357.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
9070 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
64 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220e → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420e → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 18. 22:43:33

#0 checking url part for id 11876 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11221 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.015s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#32 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#33 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#34 getting avg benchmarks for device 11876 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#37 got single benchmarks 11876 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#38 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0s ... 0.023s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#41 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.005s ... 0.029s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 11221 +0s ... 0.029s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#44 got single benchmarks 11221 +0.005s ... 0.034s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.039s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#88 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.054s

#89 return log +0s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)