, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD A10-8700P vs AMD FX-8800P

AMD A10-8700P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-8700P

The AMD A10-8700P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD FX-8800P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-8800P

The AMD FX-8800P is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A10-8700PAMD FX-8800P
AMD CarrizoAMD Carrizo
CarrizoCarrizo
Series: Carrizo Carrizo
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
1800 - 3200 MHz2100 - 3400 MHz
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
12 - 35 12-35
3100 3100
28 28
FP4 BGAFP4 BGA
HSA 1.0HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD Carrizo A10-8700P

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 190     median: 194 (2%)     max: 198 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180185.72187.66187.61185185.52184.81184.94185.64184.5185.13185.13184.77184.64183.42183.65184.48183.81182.41182.5184.13Tooltip
min: 207     avg: 255     median: 277 (3%)     max: 282 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 59     avg: 67.6     median: 69 (25%)     max: 75 Points
min: 78     avg: 81.3     median: 82 (30%)     max: 84 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.12     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (4%)     max: 2.36 Points
min: 2.53     avg: 3.1     median: 3.4 (6%)     max: 3.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.68     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (27%)     max: 0.89 Points
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 1 (31%)     max: 0.98 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2170     avg: 2294     median: 2334 (21%)     max: 2389
min: 2417     avg: 2604     median: 2604 (23%)     max: 2791
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4808     avg: 6140     median: 6394 (10%)     max: 6443
min: 6820     avg: 7860     median: 7860 (13%)     max: 8900
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 8279     avg: 8769     median: 8924.5 (9%)     max: 8949 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3080     avg: 3212     median: 3251.5 (23%)     max: 3264 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 507.427     avg: 536     median: 509.4 (6%)     max: 591.003 s
378 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.564     avg: 17.1     median: 17.2 (3%)     max: 17.47 s
12 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1293     avg: 1316     median: 1328 (9%)     max: 1328
1543 (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15.1 (7%)     max: 15.23 fps
21.1 fps (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 72.24     avg: 73.5     median: 73.7 (22%)     max: 74.41 fps
93.5 fps (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.18     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (6%)     max: 0.188 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.28     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.303 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.4     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (6%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
2.2 GB/s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2776     avg: 2985     median: 2977.5 (16%)     max: 3186 Points
4227 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.909     avg: 20.6     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 22.254 s
19.1 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.382     avg: 46.1     median: 44.8 (2%)     max: 50.362 s
41.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 954.493     avg: 985     median: 963.8 (4%)     max: 1071.86 s
874 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6309     avg: 6653     median: 6586 (8%)     max: 7129 Points
min: 10073     avg: 10092     median: 10091.5 (12%)     max: 10110 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1794     avg: 2134     median: 2150.5 (8%)     max: 2310 Points
min: 2363     avg: 2764     median: 2753.5 (10%)     max: 3187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13862     avg: 19941     median: 20873.5 (13%)     max: 22998 Points
min: 24378     avg: 30901     median: 32521 (21%)     max: 34183 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 13248     avg: 20904     median: 21997.5 (23%)     max: 23111 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 21515     avg: 23082     median: 23204 (24%)     max: 24168 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1774     avg: 1897     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 2007 Points
min: 2106     avg: 2720     median: 2843 (7%)     max: 2943 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2456     avg: 2673     median: 2685 (7%)     max: 2803 Points
min: 4031     avg: 4119     median: 4119 (10%)     max: 4207 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4550     avg: 4670     median: 4676.5 (8%)     max: 4775
6349 (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1941     avg: 1974     median: 1975 (41%)     max: 2006
2085 (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4832     avg: 5014     median: 5105 (8%)     max: 5105
6719 (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2065     avg: 2135     median: 2170 (44%)     max: 2170
2218 (45%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2229.4     avg: 2673     median: 2285.5 (4%)     max: 3488.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 154     avg: 203     median: 164.3 (2%)     max: 363.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8324     avg: 11931     median: 11800 (17%)     max: 15801 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-8700P → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-8800P → 127% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 15:17:10

#0 checking url part for id 6845 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6843 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6845 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 6845 +0.017s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6843 +0s ... 0.027s

#9 got single benchmarks 6843 +0.009s ... 0.036s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.065s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)