Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Celeron B810

Intel Celeron 887

► remove

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron B810

► remove

The Intel Celeron B810 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B810 should be similar fast as a 1.7-2 GHz Arrandale Celeron (e.g. Celeron P4500).

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The CPU was first leaked in support documents of Fujutsu laptops (Lifebook P701, S751, S761, ...).

Intel Celeron 887Intel Celeron B810
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 (compare)1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 (compare)1700 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101600 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 (compare)1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 (compare)1300 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 (compare)1800 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 (compare)1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 (compare)1500 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 (compare)1700 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 (compare)1600 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 (compare)1400 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B840 (compare)1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 (compare)1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 (compare)1700 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8101600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 (compare)1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 (compare)1300 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 (compare)1800 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 (compare)1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 (compare)1500 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 (compare)1700 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 (compare)1600 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 (compare)1400 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
1500 MHz1600 MHz
128 KB
512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
17 35
32 32
100 °C100 °C
BGA1023PGA988
HD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Intel Celeron 887Intel Celeron B810

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
887 +
1.1 Points (3%)
109%
B810 +
min: 1.23     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
887 +
0.6 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
887 +
1877 Points (19%)
111%
B810 +
min: 2077     avg: 2089     median: 2091 (21%)     max: 2099 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
887 +
3597 Points (6%)
113%
B810 +
min: 4020     avg: 4060     median: 4079 (7%)     max: 4081 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
887 +
4497 Points (6%)
112%
B810 +
min: 4995     avg: 5023     median: 5022.5 (7%)     max: 5050 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
887 +
2362 Points (22%)
109%
B810 +
min: 2550     avg: 2572     median: 2571.5 (24%)     max: 2593 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
887 +
1626 seconds (19%)
103%
B810 +
min: 1408.5     avg: 1411     median: 1411.1 (17%)     max: 1413.7 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
887 +
48 seconds (10%)
101%
B810 +
min: 44.6     avg: 44.8     median: 44.8 (9%)     max: 44.9 seconds
WinRAR - Result
100%
887 +
986 KB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
887 +
0 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
887 +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
887 +
1414 Points (9%)
115%
B810 +
min: 1630     avg: 1635     median: 1633 (11%)     max: 1641 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
887 +
28 Seconds (6%)
101%
B810 +
min: 14     avg: 21.1     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 24.7 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
887 +
64 Seconds (3%)
100%
B810 +
min: 32     avg: 47.6     median: 55.2 (2%)     max: 55.5 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
887 +
1343 Seconds (6%)
102%
B810 +
min: 762     avg: 1003     median: 1003.4 (4%)     max: 1244.8 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
B810 +
24210 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
B810 +
11500 MFLOPS (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
887 +
5.1 points (65%)
104%
B810 +
5.3 points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
887 +
3383 Points (5%)
112%
B810 +
min: 3750     avg: 3779     median: 3778.5 (5%)     max: 3807 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B810 → 106%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)