Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Celeron B800 vs Intel Celeron B815

Intel Celeron 887

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron B800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B800 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B800 should be similar fast as a 2 GHz Core 2 Duo processor.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

Intel Celeron B815

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B815 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card called Intel HD Graphics (based on the HD Graphics 2000) at 650-1050MHz and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Compared to the similar Celeron B810, the B815 offers a faster clocked graphics card.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B810 should be similar fast as a 1.7-2 GHz Arrandale Celeron (e.g. Celeron P4500).

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

ModelIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron B800Intel Celeron B815
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1500 MHz1500 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023PGA988PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$86 U.S.$80 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron B800Intel Celeron B815

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
887 +
1877 Points (15%)
102%
B800 +
1910 Points (16%)
112%
B815 +
2093 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
887 +
3597 Points (4%)
105%
B800 +
3779 Points (4%)
112%
B815 +
4029 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
4497 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
2362 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
887 +
1626 s (19%)
102%
B800 +
1508 s (18%)
103%
B815 +
1412 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
887 +
48 s (10%)
100%
B800 +
47 s (9%)
101%
B815 +
44.3 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 887 +
986 Points (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 887 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
887 +
1414 Points (3%)
108%
B800 +
1534 Points (3%)
116%
B815 +
1645 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
887 +
28 s (6%)
100%
B800 +
26.1 s (6%)
101%
B815 +
24.9 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 887 +
64 s (3%)
100%
1 B815 +
55.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 887 +
1343 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 B815 +
24000 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 B815 +
11480 MFLOPS (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
887 +
5.1 Points (65%)
100%
B800 +
5.1 Points (65%)
104%
B815 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 887 +
3383 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B800 → 103% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B815 → 107% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 29. 01:40:54

#0 checking url part for id 3348 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2726 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2994 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3348 +0s ... 0.009s

#11 got single benchmarks 3348 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2726 +0s ... 0.017s

#13 got single benchmarks 2726 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 2994 +0s ... 0.024s

#15 got single benchmarks 2994 +0.008s ... 0.031s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.033s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.036s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.037s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.039s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.041s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#34 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.044s

#35 return log +0s ... 0.044s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)