Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 797 vs Intel Celeron 877 vs Intel Celeron B810

Intel Celeron 797

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 797 is a single-core ULV processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (most likely Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 350-950MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. 

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to older processors, the 797 should be similar fast as a Celeron M 540 clocked at 1.86 GHz.

Intel Celeron 877

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 877 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 877 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 877 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore faster than the 1.4 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron B810

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B810 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B810 should be similar fast as a 1.7-2 GHz Arrandale Celeron (e.g. Celeron P4500).

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The CPU was first leaked in support documents of Fujutsu laptops (Lifebook P701, S751, S761, ...).

ModelIntel Celeron 797Intel Celeron 877Intel Celeron B810
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 797 « 1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 877 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B810 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Clock1400 MHz1400 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB
L3 Cache1.5 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1023PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$86 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 877 +
1.1 Points (1%)
116%
1 B810 +
min: 1.23     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.25 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 2077     avg: 2089     median: 2091 (13%)     max: 2099 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 4020     avg: 4060     median: 4079 (3%)     max: 4081 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 4995     avg: 5023     median: 5022.5 (3%)     max: 5050 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 2550     avg: 2572     median: 2571.5 (3%)     max: 2593 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1409     avg: 1412     median: 1411.5 (17%)     max: 1414 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 44.6     avg: 44.8     median: 44.8 (9%)     max: 44.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1630     avg: 1635     median: 1633 (3%)     max: 1641 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 14     avg: 21.1     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 24.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 32     avg: 47.6     median: 55.2 (2%)     max: 55.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 762     avg: 1004     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1245 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 B810 +
24210 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 B810 +
11500 MFLOPS (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 B810 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B810 +
min: 3750     avg: 3779     median: 3778.5 (3%)     max: 3807 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 877 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B810 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 14. 20:08:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3009 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3342 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 2328 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728929321s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:17:09 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3009 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 3009 +0s ... 0.004s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3342 +0s ... 0.005s

#11 got single benchmarks 3342 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2328 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#13 got single benchmarks 2328 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.02s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.02s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)