Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-6157U vs AMD A9-9420e

Intel Core i3-6157U

► remove from comparison Intel 6157U

The Intel Core i3-6157U is a dual-core SoC based on the Skylake architecture and has been launched in September 2015. The CPU can be found in medium-sized ultrabooks as well as normal notebooks. In addition to two CPU cores with Hyper-Threading clocked at 2.4 GHz (no Turbo Boost), the chip also integrates an Iris Graphics 550 GPU with 64 MB of eDRAM memory as well as a dual-channel DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600 memory controller. The SoC is manufactured using a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Skylake replaces both Haswell and Broadwell and brings the same microarchitecture in every TDP class from 4.5 to 45 W. The extensive improvements of the Skylake design include increased out-of-order buffers, optimized prefetching and branch prediction as well as additional performance gains through Hyper-Threading. Overall, however, performance per clock has been increased by only 5 to 10 percent (compared to Haswell) respectively under 5 percent (compard to Broadwell), which is quite modest for a new architecture ("Tock").

Furthermore, the organisation of the eDRAM cache has been modified. Instead of acting like a victim cache, which has to be adressed via the L3/LLC, the eDRAM can now be adressed directly by programms just like the main memory. The size is still 128 MB for the quad-core models (4C + GT4e), while the dual-core chips (2C + GT3e) only offer 64 MB.

Performance

According to the specified clock rates and the improved architecture, the Core i3-6157U should perform similar to a Core i3-5157U (Broadwell, 15 W). Thus, the CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as more demanding applications and multitasking.

Graphics

The integrated graphics unit called Iris Graphics 550 represents the "GT3e" version of the Skylake GPU (Intel Gen. 9). The 48 Execution Units, also called EUs, are clocked at 350 - 1000 MHz and offer (thanks to the fast eDRAM cache) a performance similar to a dedicated GeForce 930M. Games of 2015 can thus be played smoothly in low or medium settings. For more information about performance and features, check our page for the Iris Graphics 550.

Power Consumption

Specified at a TDP of 28 W (including CPU, GPU and memory controller), the CPU is best suited for medium-sized notebooks (13-inches and above). Optionally, the TDP can be lowered to 23 watts (cTDP down), reducing both heat dissipation and performance.

AMD A9-9420e

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420e

The AMD A9-9420e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation). It was first found in the Dell Inspiron 3000 with passive cooling and 4 GB DDR4 RAM. The performance in that device was way below the normal A9-9420 as the clock speed only reached up to 2,5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 between 10-25 Watts, but the passively cooled A9-9420e should be positioned lower than 9 Watt.

ModelIntel Core i3-6157UAMD A9-9420e
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameSkylakeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
Intel Core i3-6167U compare2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6100H compare2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6157U « 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6100U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-6006U compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e « - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2400 MHz <=2500? MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP28 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketBGABGA
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NISingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,
iGPUIntel Iris Graphics 550 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Architecturex86x86
$304 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Transistors1200 Million
Die Size124.5 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 6157U +
1614 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 6157U +
638 Points (27%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 6157U +
248 Points (28%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 6157U +
624 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
242 Points (2%)
97 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 6157U +
98.8 Points (30%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 6157U +
7212 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 6157U +
2769 MIPS (33%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 6157U +
1.9 fps (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 6157U +
3168 Seconds (40%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 6157U +
1742 Seconds (12%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 6157U +
1.1 sec (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 6157U +
3701 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 6157U +
1589 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6157U +
668 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6157U +
1519 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6157U +
665 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6157U +
1506 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6157U +
3246 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6157U +
6371 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 6157U +
1582 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 6157U +
80.3 Points (23%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 6157U +
121.3 Points (25%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 6157U +
625 Points (24%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-6157U → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420e → 40% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 21. 02:16:33

#0 checking url part for id 8470 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8470 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 8470 +0.012s ... 0.043s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.008s ... 0.053s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.077s ... 0.13s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.154s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)